Self-estimates of ability have been shown to be generally inaccurate but still continue to be used in career decision-making. The present study investigates the role of feedback and individual differences in goal orientation and self-efficacy in determining accuracy of self-estimates. A total sample of 94 high school-aged students gave self-estimates of their ability and completed questionnaires regarding self-efficacy, goal orientation and feedback. Participants were categorised as over-estimators, under-estimators or accurate estimators according to the difference between their self-estimate of ability and an objective measure. Results indicated four main areas of feedback sources, and a positive relationship between ability and accuracy of self-estimates. Learning goal orientation and use of feedback were positively related; however their effects on accuracy of self-assessment were contrary to those hypothesised. Practical implications of these findings for career decision-making, as well as suggestions for future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261–271.
2.
AngS.CummingsL. L.StraubD. W.EarleyP. C. (1993). The effects of information technology and the perceived mood of the feedback giver on feedback seeking. Information Systems Research, 4 (3), 240–261.
3.
AshfordS. J.BlattR.VandeWalleD. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behaviour in organisations. Journal of Management, 29(6), 773–799.
4.
AthanasouJ. A. (2005). Issues in self-evaluation in adult education and training. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 45 (3), 290–303.
5.
AtwaterL.YammarinoF. J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions?Personnel Psychology, 45 (1), 141–164.
6.
BursonK. A.LarrickR. P.KlaymanJ. (2006). Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90 (1), 60–77.
7.
ButtonS. B.MathieuJ. E.ZajacD. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organisational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26–48.
8.
ChenC. P. (2003). Integrating perspectives in career development theory and practice. Career Development Quarterly, 51 (3), 203–216.
9.
ChenG.GullyS. M.EdenD. (2001). Validation of a new self-efficacy scale. Organisational Research Methods, 4 (1), 62–83.
10.
DweckC. S.LeggetE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95 (2), 256–273.
11.
FoxS.CaspyT.ReislerA. (1994). Variables affecting leniency, halo and validity of self-appraisal. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67 (1), 45–56.
12.
GottfredsonL. S. (1996). Gottfredson's Theory of Circumscription and Compromise. In BrownD.BrooksL. (Eds.), Career Choice and Development (3rd ed., pp. 179–232). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
GriffinR. W. (2005). Management (7th ed.) Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
HeroldD. M.FedorD. B. (1998). Individuals' interactions with feedback environment: The role of domain-specific individual differences. In FerrisG. R.RowlandK. M. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management, vol. 16 (pp. 215–254). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work adjustment (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
16.
JonasE.Schulz-HardtS.FreyD.ThelanN. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 557–571.
17.
KrugerJ.DunningD. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognising one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6), 1121–1134.
18.
LauS. W. Y. (2005). The role of individual differences and measurement approaches in determining accuracy of self-rated abilities: Implications for career assessment. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia.
19.
LevyP. E.AlbrightM. D.CawleyB. D.WilliamsJ. R. (1995). Situational and individual determinants of feedback seeking: A close look at the process. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62 (1), 23–37.
20.
LuusC.A.WellsG. L. (1994). Eyewitness identification confidence. In RossD.F.ReadJ. D.TogliaM. P. (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 348–361). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
MabeP. A.WestS. G. (1982). Validity of self-evaluation of ability: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67 (3), 280–296.
22.
MalmendierU.TateG. (2006). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60 (6), 2661–2700.
23.
MillerV. D.JablinF. M. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 92–120.
24.
RennR. W.FedorD. B. (2001). Development and field test of a feedback seeking, self-efficacy, and goal setting model of work performance. Journal of Management, 27 (5), 563–583.
25.
SampsonJ. P.Jr.PetersonG. W.ReardonR. C.LenzJ. G. (2003). Key elements to the CIP approach to designing career services. Center for the Study of Technology in Counseling and Career Development, Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
26.
ScherbaumC. A.Cohen-CharashY.KernM. J. (2006). Measuring general self-efficacy: A comparison of three measures using item response theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 (6), 1047–1063.
27.
ShawJ. S.ZerrT. K.WoythalerK. A. (2001). Public eyewitness confidence ratings can differ from those held privately. Law and Human Behavior, 25 (2), 141–154.
28.
SjostromK. P.MarksA. (1994). Pretest and posttest confidence ratings in test performance by low-, medium-, and high-scoring students. Teaching of Psychology, 21 (1), 12–16.
29.
StajkovicA. D. (2006). Development of a core confidence-higher order construct. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (6), 1208–1224.
30.
SuperD. E. (1990). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. In BrownD.BrooksL. (Eds.), Career Choice and Development: Applying contemporary theories to practice(2nd ed., pp. 197–261). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
VancouverJ. B.KendallL. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (5), 1146–1153.
32.
VancouverJ. B.ThompsonC. M.TischnerE. C.PutkaD. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3), 506–516.
33.
VandeWalleD. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57 (6), 995–1015.
34.
VandeWalleD. (2003). A goal orientation model of feedback-seeking behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 13 (4), 581–604.
35.
VandeWalleD.CummingsL. L. (1997). A test of the influence of goal orientation on the feedback-seeking process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82 (3), 390–400.
36.
WahlstromD. (2001). The relationship between goal orientation and the calibration of performance expectations to performance feedback. Presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) National Convention Seattle, WA.
37.
WellsG. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification?American Psychologist, 48 (5), 553–571.
38.
WhyteG.SaksA. M.HookS. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18 (5), 415–432.
39.
YeoG. B.NealA. (2006). An examination of the dynamic relationship between self-efficacy and performance across levels of analysis and specificity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91 (5), 1088–1101.
