This paper presents the results of an exploratory study conducted to determine
the impact of the progressive work and family policies implemented in the
Sydney Water Corporation. Sydney Water used this study to identify interven
tion strategies to assist the corporation to realize the full potential of their
family-friendly policies, so employees can not only balance work and family,
but also balance career and family too. The study indicates these policies are
highly regarded by employees in assisting them to balance their work and
family responsibilities, particularly by the part-time workforce. It is also appar
ent there are concerns that real career advancement costs are associated with
accessing flexible work practices. In line with recent literature, there is a per
ception that the legitimacy of flexible work practices is questionable, and that
employees who access family-friendly policies may be disadvantaged with
respect to their career advancement prospects. This is a clear disincentive for
accessing alternate work practices, and presents a challenge to all organiza
tions, not just Sydney Water.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aide, J.A. & Carmody, H.I. (1991) Families at work, practical examples from 140 businesses . Melbourne: The Council for Equal Opportunity in Employment.
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1995) The labour force, Australia, catalogue no. 6203.0. Canberra : AGPS.
3.
Australian Quality Council (1997) Australian quality awards-Assessment criteria and application guidelines. Australian Quality Awards Foundation.
4.
Cass, B. (1995) Gender in Australia's restructuring labour market and welfare state. In A. Edwards and S. Magarey (eds), Women in a restructuring Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
5.
Catalyst (1993) Successful initiatives for breaking the glass ceiling to upward mobility for minorities and women . New York: Catalyst.
6.
Dunoon, D. (1995) Building bridges, work and family practices and workplace productivity. Canberra: AGPS
7.
Dunphy, D.C. (1981) Organizational change by choice. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
8.
Galinsky, E. (1992) Work and family, status report and outlook. New York: Families and Work Institute.
9.
Grover, S. & Crooker K. (1995) Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48: 271-88.
10.
Hammond, V. (1994) Opportunity 2000: Good practice in UK organisations . In M. Davidson and R. Burke (eds), Women in management, current research issues. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
11.
Heilman, M. (1994) Affirmative action: Some unintended consequences for working women. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 16: 125-69.
12.
Lambert, S., Hopkins, K., Easton, G., Walker, J., McWilliams, H. & Chung, S. (1993) Added benefits: The link between family responsive policies and job performance. Chicago: University of Chicago.
13.
Lamont, L. & Russell, M. (1995) Can the executives retreat?Sydney Morning Herald, 19 June: 11.
14.
Loveman, G. (1990) The case of the part-time partner. Harvard Business Review, 68(5): 12-29.
15.
Napoli, J. (1994) Work and family responsibilities: Adjusting the balance. Sydney: CCH Australia.
16.
New Women Magazine (1995) Women for a better workplace. June.
17.
Osterman, P. (1995) Work/family programs and the employment relationship . Administrative Science Quarterly,40: 681-700.
18.
Peters, J.Peters, B. & Caropreso, F. (1990) Work and family policies: The new strategic plan . New York: The Conference Board .
19.
Porter, M. (1985) Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: The Free Press.
20.
Pringle. J. & Tudhope, J. (1996) Family friendly policies: The experiences of three New Zealand companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources , 34(3), 77-89.
21.
Schein, V. (1993) The work and family interface, challenging 'corporate convenient'. Women in Management Review, 8(4), 11-27.
22.
Schwartz, D. (1994) An examination of the impact of family-friendly policies on the glass ceiling. New York: Families and Work Institute.
23.
Schwartz, D. (1996) The impact of work-family policies on women's career development: Boon or bust?Women in Management Review, 11(1): 5-19.
24.
Schwartz, F. (1989) Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review, January-February: 65-76.
25.
Shellenbarger, S. (1992a) Flexible policies may slow women's careers. Wall Street journal, 24 June.
26.
Shellenbarger, S. (1992b) Averting career damage from family policies. Wall Street Journal, 24 June.
27.
Shellenbarger, S. (1993) Best list for working mothers shows new faces: Midwest firms, oil giants. Wall Street Journal, 16 September.
28.
Singleton, R.A., Straits, B.C. & Straits, M.M. (1993) Approaches to social research, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Starrels, M. (1992) The evolution of workplace family policy research . Journal of Family Issues, 13(3): 259-78.
30.
Still, L.V. & Mortimer, D. (1994) Where to from here? Women managers and the cultural dilemma. Women in Management Series, Paper no. 20. University of Western Sydney, Nepean, Faculty of Commerce.
31.
Swiss, D.J. & Walker, J.P. (1993) Women and the work/family dilemma. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
32.
Taylor-Carter, M., Doverspike, D. and Cook, K. (1995) Understanding resistance to sex- and race-based affirmative action: A review of research findings. Human Resource Management Review, 5(2) pp. 129-57.
33.
Thomas, A. (1991) BP now measures performance not time spent in the office. Business Review Weekly, 18 January: 74-5.
34.
Wolcott, I. (1994) Work and family, Monograph no. 6. Canberra: Affirmative Action Agency and Work and Family Unit, AGPS.
35.
Work and Family Unit (1994a) Work and family. Canberra: AGPS .
36.
Work and Family Unit (1994b) The workplace guide to work and family. Canberra: AGPS.
37.
Zikmund, W. (1994) Business research methods, 4th edn. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press .
