Decentralized computer-based information systems have the potential to support a wider range of organi
zational forms than centralized systems. For organizations contemplating the introduction of new infor
mation technology into their offices, distributed systems appear to be the most effective choice on the basis
of flexibility, expandability, cost, organizational and quality of working life criteria. With appropriate user
participation and training programmes, networking can improve communications within and between functions
and facilitate user access to an integrated data-base in text, graphics, image, data and voice (eventually) mode.
But, there is a sting in the tail of decentralized computing systems ... surveillance over users.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asplund, C.Information, technology and trade unions. In Bjorn-Andersen, N., Earl, M., Holst, O. and Mumford, E. (Eds.), Information Society: For Richer, For Poorer. North Holland: Ansterdam (1982), 221-230.
2.
Bjorn-Andersen, N. The changing roles of secretaries and clerks. In Otway, H. J. and Peltu, M. (Eds.), New Office Technology:
3.
Human and Organizational Aspects. Frances Pinter: London (1983), 120-137 (a).
4.
Bjoran-Andersen, N.Information technology and power change in organizations: Prospects of technology agreements and technology assessments. In Grewlich, K. and Pedersen, F. H. (Eds.),
5.
Power and Participation in an Information Society. Office for Official Publications: EEC (1983). (b).
6.
Bjorn-Andersen, N., Hedberg, B., Mercer, D. Mumford, E. and Sole, A. (Eds.). The Impact of Systems Change in Organizations.
7.
Sijthoff & Noordhoff: Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands (1979).
8.
Briefs, U., Ciborra, C. and Schneider, I. (Eds.). Systems Design For, With, and By the Users. North-Holland: Amsterdam (1983).
9.
Butera, F. and Bartezzaghi, E.Creating the right organizational environment. In Otway, H. J. and Peltu, M. (Eds.), New Office
10.
Technology: Human and Organizational Aspects. Frances Pinter: London (1983), 102-119.
11.
Cameron, A. P. and Astell, A. The LAN Project: A behavioural evaluation of an office electronic workstation and communication
Child, J. Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice. Harper & Row: London (1984).
14.
Clegg, C. and Kemp, N. CNC Machine Tools and Job Design:
15.
A Field Study. MRC/ESRC SAPU Memo 716, University of Sheffield, 1985.
16.
Crozier, M.Implications for the organization. In Otway, H. J. and Peltu, M. (Eds.), New Office Technology: Human and Organizational Aspects. Frances Pinter: London (1983), 86-101.
17.
Damodaran, L. and Pomfrett, S.The man-machine interface. In Clegg, C. W. , Kemp, N. J. and Legge, K. (Eds.), Case Studies in Organizational Behaviour. Harper & Row: London (1985), 23-29.
18.
Danziger, J.N., Dutton, W.H., Kling, R. and Kraemer, K.L.Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments. Columbia University Press:New York ( 1982).
19.
Evans, A. and Cowling, A.Personnel's part in organisation restructuring. Personnel Management. (1985), 14-17.
20.
Fitter, M., Brownbridge, G., Garber, R. and Herzmark, G.A human factors evaluation of the IBM Sheffield Primary Care System. In Proceedings of INTERACT '84: First IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. IFIP (1984 , 2), 128-134.
21.
Florentin, J.J.Environment problems in introducing office automation systems. In Proceedings of INTERACT '84: First IFIP Conference on Human Computer Interaction. IFIP (1984, 1), 444-446.
22.
Gregory, J. and Nussbaum, K.Race against time: Automation of the office. Office: Technology and People . (1982, 1), 197-236.
23.
King, J.L.Centralized versus decentralized computing: Organizational considerations and management options. Computing Surveys. ( 1983, 15), 319-349.
24.
Land, F., Detjejaruwat, N. and Smith, C.Factors affecting social control: The reasons and values — Part 1. Systems, Objectives, Solutions. (1983, 3), 155-164.
25.
Lenk, K.Computer use in publid administration: Implications for the citizen. In Mowshowitz, A. (Ed.), Human Choice and Computers, 2. North-Holland: Amsterdam (1980), 193-211.
26.
Markus, M.L. and Robey, D. The organizational validity of management information systems. Sloan Working Paper No. 1212, Sloan School ofManagement, M.I.T. (1981).
27.
Mumford, E.Successful systems design. In Otway, H. J. and Peltu, M. (Eds.), New Office Technology: Human and Organizational Aspects. Frances Pinter: London (1983), 68-85.
28.
Mumford, E.Values, Technology and Work. Martinus Nijhoff:The Hague (1981).
29.
Nillesen, G. and Goosens, P.Managing the introduction of new office systems. In Otway, H. J. and Peltu, M. (Eds.), The Managerial Challenge of New Office Technology. Butterworths : London (1984), 196-223.
30.
Wainwright, J.Office automation — its design, implementation and impact. Personnel Review. (1984, 13), 1, 2-10.
31.
Walton, R.E. and Vittori, W.New information technology: Organizational problem of opportunity? Office Technology and People. (1983, 1), 249-273.
32.
Wynne, B.The changing roles of managers. In Otway, H. J. and Peltu, M. (Eds.), New Office Technology: Human and Organizational Aspects. Frances Pinter: London (1983), 138-151 ■
