Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In an article entitled 'How to Evaluate thee Teacher — Let me Count the Ways', Haefele (1980) recounts twelve common methods of teacher evaluation. In his brief review he ranges through the standardised test approaches, systematic observational methods, paper and pencil instruments and situational tests but he concludes his survey of methods by coming down in favour of a goal-setting approach. He does so because a goal-setting approach is based on mutual trust, whereas other techniques rely on the establishment of judgemental, adversary relationships. It is this goal-oriented model of performance evaluation that it is proposed to examine in this paper. The precise orientation will be towards teachers in colleges of advanced education but there is no obvious reason to suppose that the discussion and critical review which follows could not be applied to other types of organisations and institutions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carroll, Stephen J. and Tosi, Henry L. 1973. Management by Objectives. New York : Macmillan.

Duncan W. Jack. 1978. Essentials of Management. Hillsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.

Gaff, J.G. , Wilson, R.C. and Associates. 1975. College Professors and their Impact on Students. New York: Wiley.

Gill, Deirdre. 1977. Appraising Performance. London: I.P.M. Haefele, Donald L. 1980. How to evaluate thee, teacher — let me count the ways, Phi Delta Kappan, 61(5) January: 349-352. Hives, Peter. Management by Objectives L. (Eds.). 1975. Man

agement Development and Training Handbook. London: McGraw-Hill.

Hollmann, Robert W. Applying M.B.O. research in practice. In Greenlaw, Paul S. (Ed.). 1979. Readings in Personnel Management. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.

Hostrop, Richard W. 1975. Managing Education for Results. California : E.T.C. Publications.

Jones, K.B. 1972. Management by Objectives. An unpublished paper presented on behalf of Australian Wire Industries.

Koontz, Harold. 1971. Appraising Managers as Managers. New York: McGraw-Hill.

10.

Landers, Audry D. Evaluating teachers. In Milton, Ohmer and

11.

Associates. 1978. On College Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

12.

McGregor, Douglas. 1957. An uneasy look at performance appraisal. Harvard Business Review. 35(3) May/June: 89-94.

13.

Reprinted in Harvard Business Review. 50(5) September/October 1972.

14.

Morrisey, George L. 1972. Appraisal and Development through Objectives and Result . Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley .

15.

New South Wales Department of Education. 1977. Handbook: Instructions and Information for the Guidance of Teachers (Book 2). Sydney: N.S.W. Government Printer.

16.

Odiorne, George S. Management by Objectives. In Craig, Robert

17.

L. (Ed.) 1976. Training and Development Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill.

18.

Scriven, Michael. The Methodology of Evaluation. In Tyler, Ralph, Gagne, Robert M., and Scriven, Michael. 1969. Perspec

19.

tives of Curriculum Evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co.

20.

Smith, Howard P. and Brouwer, Paul J. 1977. Performance Appraisal and Human Development. Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley.

21.

Stoner, James A.F. 1982. Management (Second Edition). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

22.

Tosi, Henry L. , Rizzo, John R. and Carroll, Stephen J. Setting Goals in Management by Objectives . In Wexley, Kenneth N. and Yukl, Gary A. 1975. Organizational Behaviour and Industrial Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

College Teacher Evaluation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References