This paper examines the theory and evidence of the effect of finance, ownership, and corporate governance on labour and employment, with special reference to the so-called `market-outsider' or liberal market economies. The main finance, ownership, and governance characteristics of these economies are described and briefly compared with those in so-called co-ordinated market economies. A set of predictions of the impact on labour management and employment are outlined. Evidence is presented from comparative studies and from within-country studies, especially of the United Kingdom. It is found that predictions are not clearly borne out, and the paper identifies a set of factors to explain this. These include dispersed ownership, the nature of corporate law, and the public visibility of listed companies.
Anderson, K., S. Marshall, and I. Ramsay.2007. Do institutional investors aim to influence the human resource practices of investee companies? Research report. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation and Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law.
2.
Anderson, M., M. Jones, S. Marshall, R. Mitchell, and I. Ramsay.2006. Evaluating the shareholder primacy theory: Evidence from a survey of Australian directors. Melbourne : University of Melbourne, Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation and Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law .
3.
Armour, J., S. Deakin, and S. Konzelmann.2003. Shareholder primacy and the trajectory of UK corporate governance. British Journal of Industrial Relations41(3): 531-56.
4.
Bacon, N., and B. Berry.2005. Shareholders, stakeholders, and HRM . Nottingham: University of Nottingham .
5.
Berle, A., and G. Means.1932. The modern corporation and private property . New York: Macmillan.
6.
Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan .1999. Is there discretion in wage setting? A test using takeover legislation. Rand Journal of Economics30: 535-54.
7.
Bertrand, M., and S. Mullainathan .2003. Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics111(5): 1043-75.
8.
Black, B., and J. Coffee.1994. Hail Britannia: Institutional investor behaviour under limited regulation. Michigan Law Review92: 1997-2087.
9.
Black, B., H. Gospel, and A. Pendleton.2007. Finance, corporate governance, and the employment relationship. Industrial Relations46(3): 643-50.
10.
Black, B., H. Gospel, and A. Pendleton.2008. The impact of equity markets and corporate governance on labour market flexibility. International Journal of Human Resource Management19(10): 1792-808.
11.
Burgess, J., J. Lewer, and P. Waring.2006. Does socially responsible investment influence employment relations?Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
12.
Cameron, L.2007. Investor protection and the New Zealand stock market. Policy Perspectives Paper 07/02. Wellington: New Zealand Treasury.
13.
Carr, C., and C. Tomkins.1998. Context, culture and the role of the finance function in strategic decisions: A comparative analysis of Britain, Germany, the USA, and Japan. Management Accounting Research9: 213-39.
14.
Cox, P., S. Brammer, and A. Millington.2004. An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics52(1): 27-43.
15.
Cronqvist, H., F. Heyman, M. Nilsson, H. Svalery, and J. Vlachos.2007. Do entrenched managers pay their workers more? Paper presented to American Finance Association , Chicago, January.
16.
Deakin, S.2005. The coming transformation of shareholder value . Corporate Governance13(1): 11-18.
17.
Deakin, S., R. Hobbs, S. Konzelmann, and F. Wilkinson.2006. Anglo-American corporate governance and the employment relationship: a case to answer? Socio-Economic Review4(1): 155-74.
18.
Demirag, I.1998. Board of directors' short-term perceptions and evidence of managerial short-termism. European Journal of Finance3(1): 195-211.
19.
Fama, E., and M. Jensen.1983. Separation of ownership and control . Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-25.
20.
Franks, J., and C. Mayer.1997. Corporate ownership and control in the UK, Germany, and the US. In Studies in international corporate finance and governance systems, ed. D. Chew, 281-96. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Froud, J., C. Haslam, S. Johal, and K. Williams.2000. Restructuring for shareholder value and its implications for labour. Cambridge Journal of Economics24: 771-97.
22.
Gospel, H., and A. Pendleton.2003. Finance, corporate governance and the management of labour: a conceptual and comparative analysis. British Journal of Industrial Relations41(3): 557-83.
23.
Gourevitch, P., and J. Shinn.2005. Political power and corporate control: The new global politics of corporate governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Graves, S., and S. Waddock.1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal37(4): 1034-46.
25.
Haigh, M., and J. Hazelton.2004. Financial markets: a tool for social responsibility? Journal of Business Ethics52(1): 59-71.
26.
Hall, P., and D. Gingerich.2001. Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the macroeconomy: An empirical analysis. Mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
27.
Hall, P., and D. Soskice.2001. Varieties of capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
Hendry, C., S. Woodward, J. Harvey-Cook, and M. Gaved.1999. Investors' views of people management . Corporate Governance7(4): 324-37.
29.
Hutton, W.1996. The state we're in. London: Vintage.
Jackson, G.2005. Towards a comparative perspective on corporate governance and labour management: enterprise coalitions and national trajectories . In Corporate governance and labour management: an international comparison , eds H. Gospel and A. Pendleton, 84-112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Jacoby, S.2005. Corporate governance and employees in the United States . In Corporate governance and labour management: An international comparison, eds H. Gospel and A. Pendleton, 33-58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
Jones, M., S. Marshall, R. Mitchell, and I. Ramsay.2007. Company directors' views regarding stakeholders. Research report. University ofMelbourne : Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation and Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law.
34.
Konzelmann, S., N. Conway, L. Trenberth, and F. Wilkinson.2006. Corporate governance and human resource management. British Journal of Industrial Relations43: 541-67.
35.
La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Schleifer, and R. Vishny.1997. Legal determinants of external finance . Journal of Finance52: 1131-50.
36.
Lazonick, W., and M. O'Sullivan.2000. Maximising shareholder value: A new ideology for corporate governance. Economy and Society. 29: 13-35.
37.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).2008. Guidelines for multinational enterprises . Paris: OECD.
38.
Pagano, M., and P. Volpin.2005. Managers, workers, and corporate control . Journal of Finance60(2): 841-68.
39.
Pendleton, A., and S. Deakin.2007. Corporate governance and workplace employment relations: the potential of WERS 2004. Industrial Relations Journal38(4): 338-55.
40.
Pendleton, A., and H. Gospel.2005. The United Kingdom case. In Corporate governance and labour management: An international comparison , eds H. Gospel and A. Pendleton, 59-83. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Pendleton, A., and H. Gospel.2006. The impact of stock-market listing on employment practices? A comparison of listed and privately-owned workplaces in Britain. Paper presented at Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne and Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Sydney.
42.
Pendleton, A., and H. Gospel.2008. Ownership, governance, and workers' pay.
43.
Porter, M.1997. Capital choices: changing the way America invests in industry . In Studies in international corporate finance and governance systems: A comparison of the US, Japan and Europe, ed. D. Chew, 5-17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Sassalos, S.1995. The effects of ownership on relative wages. Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association (IIRA), 87-97. Madison, WI: IIRA.
45.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny.1997. A survey of corporate governance . Journal of Finance52: 737-83.
46.
Sjöberg, O.2008. Corporate governance and earnings inequality in the OECD countries 1979-2000. Paper presented at Equalsoc conference, Berlin, April.
47.
Stockhammer, E.2004. Financialisation and the slowdown of accumulation CambridgeJournal of Economics28: 719-41.
48.
UN Global Compact.2008. Corporate citizenship in the world economy. New York: UN Global Compact Office.
49.
Waring, P.2005. Institutional investors and contemporary corporate governance: prospects for enhanced protection of employee interests in liberal market economies. Paper presented to the 26th conference of the International Working Party on Segmentation Theory.
50.
Waring, P., and J. Lewer.2004. The impact of socially responsible investment on human resource management: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics52(1): 99-108.
51.
Werner, S., H. Tosi, and L. Gomez-Mejia.2005. Organisational governance and employee pay: How ownership structure affects the firm's compensation strategy. Strategic Management Journal36: 377-84.
52.
Wright, M., N. Bacon, and K. Amess.In press. The impact of private equity and buyouts on employment, remuneration and other HRM practices. Journal of Industrial Relations.
53.
World Bank.2007. World Bank development indicators. www.worldbank.org
