We examine the way a leading US-based, global athletic shoe and sports apparel firm applies its labour code of practice to four prime contractors located in South Korea. The content of the code, the mechanisms used in implementing the code, and employment relations behaviour associated with the code are investigated. We find evidence for arrangements resembling relational contracting and high compliance by the four Korean contractor plants in regard to the global firm’s code of labour practices. Employment relations patterns in the plants are similar and related to implementation of the global firm’s labour practices code. However, there are some noteworthy differences that are explained by variations in workplace dependence on the global corporation and the history and current approaches of contractor management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asian Wall Street Journal. 2000. Koreans, Vietnamese learn to get along with culturally sensitive assembly line . 25–26 Feb. http://www.wsj.com.
2.
Barff, R., and J. Austen, J. 1993. ‘It’s gotta be da shoes’: Domestic manufacturing, international subcontracting, and the production of athletic footwear . Environment and Planning A, 25: 1103–1114 .
3.
Burnett, E., and J. Mahon. 2001. Monitoring compliance with international labor standards . Challenge44(2): 51–72 .
4.
Chan, A. 1996. Boot camp at the shoe factory. Guardian Weekly17 November: 20–21.
5.
Chan, A. 1998. Labor standards and human rights: The case of Chinese workers under market socialism . Human Rights Quarterly20: 886–904 .
6.
Connor, T. 2001. Still waiting for Nike to do it. San Francisco: Global Exchange . www.globalexchange.org
7.
Dicken, P. 1998. Global shift: Transforming the world economy. London: Chapman Press .
8.
Dyer, J.H., and W. Chu. 2000. The determinants of trust in supplier–automaker relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea . Journal of International Business Studies31(2): 259–285 .
9.
Dyer, J.H., D.S. Cho, and W. Chu. 1998. Strategic supplier segmentation: the next ‘best practice’ in supply chain management . California Management Review40(2): 57–77 .
10.
Frenkel, S.J. 2001. Globalization, Athletic footwear commodity chains and employment relations in southern China . Organization Studies22(4): 531–562 .
11.
Frenkel, S.J., and D. Scott. 2002. Compliance, collaboration, and codes of labor practice: The Adidas connection . California Management Review45(1): 1–21 .
Gereffi, G., F. Palpacuer, and A. Parisotto (eds). 1999. Global production and local jobs. Geneva: International Labour Office .
14.
Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. 2002. Developing a theory of value chains: A framework document . Global Value Chains Conference, Rockport, Massachusetts, 25–28 April.
15.
Hancké, B. 1998. Trust or hierarchy? Changing relationships between large and small firms in France . Small Business Economics11: 236–252 .
16.
Helper, S.R., and M. Sako. 1995. Supplier relations in Japan and the United States: Are they converging? Sloan Management Review36(3): 77–84 .
17.
International Labour Organization. 1998. ILO declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work and its follow-up. Geneva: International Labour Organization Publications .
18.
International Labour Organization. 2000. Labour practices in the footwear, leather, textiles and clothing industries. Geneva: International Labour Office .
19.
Incomes Data Service (IDS) and G. Tsogas. 1998. Corporate codes of conduct and labour standards in global sourcing. Cardiff Business School .
20.
Jenkins, R. 2001. Corporate codes of conduct: Self-regulation in a global economy. Programme Paper Number 2. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development .
21.
Kim, D-O., and S. Kim. 2000. Globalization, financial crisis, and industrial relations: the case of Korea. unpublished paper.
22.
Kim, D-O., and G. Yu. 1999. Emerging patterns of human resource management in Korea: evidence from large Korean firms . International Industrial Relations Association 12th World Congress, Tokyo, Japan, 29–30 June.
23.
Klein, N. 2000. No logo. London: Flamingo .
24.
National Statistics Office Korea. 2000. Statistical information, Seoul .
25.
New York Times. 2000. MIT report says international accounting firm overlooks factory abuses. 28 September, A12-A12.
26.
Noteboom, B. 1998. Cost, quality, and learning based governance of buyer-supplier relations. In The changing boundaries of the firm, ed. G. Colombo. London: Routledge .
27.
Organization for Economic & Cultural Development (OECD). 2000. The OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Paris: OECD .
28.
Paul, C., R. Sun., P. Liu, and M. Bates. 1998. Chinese labour law and practice. Unpublished report. Oxford: Said Business School, Oxford University.
29.
Sako, M. 1992. Prices, quality and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
30.
Singh, A., and A. Zammit. 2000. The global labour standards controversy: Critical issues for developing countries. Geneva: The South Centre .
31.
Tsogas, G. 2001. Labor standards in corporate codes of conduct in labor regulation in a global economy. New York: ME Sharpe, Inc.
32.
Varley, P. (ed.). 1998. The sweatshop quandary: Corporate responsibility on the global frontier. Washington DC: Investor Responsibility Research Center .
