The paper argues that the success or otherwise of diversity policies is (partly) dependent on their relation with the prevailing employment system. Changes in the British employment system under the New Labour government are reviewed, with particular reference to their implications for diversity, especially gender equality, issues. Some of the main areas of current policydebate are considered, including the `business case' approach. The problems for policy remain, however, particularly in the gendered nature of the components of the employment system, including industrial relations and HRM institutions and structures. Implications for future research are explored.
Beer, M. , B. Spector, P. Lawrence, D. Quinn-Mills, and R.Walton. 1984. Managing human assets. New York: Free Press.
3.
Cassell, C.2001. Managing Diversity. In Contemporary human resource management, eds Tom Redman and Adrian Wilkinson. Harlow: Pearson Education.
4.
Collinson, D. , D. Knights, and M. Collinson. 1990. Managing to discriminate. London: Routledge.
5.
Cully, M. , S. Woodland, A. O'Reilly, and G. Dix. 1999. Britain at work; as depicted by the 1998 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. London: Routledge.
6.
Dickens, L.1994. The business case for women's equality: Is the carrot better than the stick?Employee Relations16(8): 5-18.
7.
Dickens, L.1999. Beyond the business case: A three pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal9(1): 9-19.
8.
Dickens, R. , P. Gregg, and J. Wadsworth. 2000. New Labour and the labour market: Labour market consequences of technical and structural change, Discussion Paper No. 59. Centre for Economic Performance, University of Oxford.
9.
Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC).1995. Race for opportunity: A business case for ethnic minorities. Equal Opportunities Review64 (Nov.-Dec.): 24-31.
Guest, D.1987. Human resource management and industrial relations. Journal of Management Studies24(5): 503-521.
12.
Huselid, M.A.1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover. productivity and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal38: 635-672.
13.
Kandola, R. , and J. Fullerton. 1998. Managing the mosaic: Diversity in action. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
14.
Martin, Joanne . 2001. Gender equity interventions: what works, what does not, and why. Paper presented to ARC Workshop on Diversity Management, Melbourne, Australia.
15.
McKay, S.2000. Between flexibility and regulation: Rights, equality and protection at work. British Journal of Industrial Relations39(2): 285-303.
16.
Millward, N. , A. Bryson, and J. Forth. 2000. All change at work: British employment relations 1980-1998. London: Routledge.
17.
Nonaka, I. , and T. Nishiguchi, eds. 2001. Knowledge emergence: Social, technical and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Perotin, V. , and A. Robinson. 2000. Employee participation and equal opportunities practices: Productivity effect and potential complementarities. British Journal of Industrial Relations38(4): 557-583.
19.
Ramsay, H. , D. Scholarios and B. Harley. 2000. Employees and high-performance work systems: testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations38(4): 501-531.
20.
Rubery, J. and D. Grimshaw2001. ICTs and employment: The problem of job quality. International Labour Review140(2): 165-192.
21.
Smith, P. , and G. Morton. 2001. New Labour's reform of Britain's employment law: The devil is not only in the detail but in the values and policy too. British Journal of Industrial Relations39(1): 119-138.
22.
Towers, B.1997. The representation gap: Change and reform in the British and American workplace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
