This review examines the operation of an industrial relations system through the notion of a dominant paradigm; and the struggles of protagonists to shift the paradigm in different directions to enhance their chances of success in future struggles. The dominant paradigm operating in Australia is contractualist regulation, a regulatory system tendered and served by the Contractualist Regulation Club. Major issues examined in the review include the High Court's decision on allowable award matters; employee entitlements; failed attempts by the Commonwealth government to introduce various legislative changes; policy positions of the Australian Labor Party and the Australian Council of Trade Unions; the McCallum Report into Victorian industrial relations; and the Federal Court's approach to anti-suit injunctions, freedom of association, and Australian Workplace Agreements and freedom of association.
Airc.2000. Annual report of the president of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (1 July 1999 to 30 June 2000). Canberra: AGPS .
2.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).1990 . Award coverage Australia, cat. no. 6315.0. Canberra: ABS.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).1999 . Earnings, benefits and union members, cat. no. 6310. Canberra: ABS.
4.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).2000 . Employee earnings and hours, Australia preliminary, cat. no. 6305.0. Canberra: ABS.
5.
Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU).2000. Policies and resolutions. Congress 2000. http://www.actu.asn.au
6.
Australian Labor Party (ALP).2000. ALP platform2000. http://www.alp.org.au
7.
Bennett, L.1992. The American model of labour law in Australia. Australian Journal of Labour Law5: 135-57.
8.
Dabscheck, B.1990. Industrial relations and the irresistible magic wand: The BCA's plan to Americanise Australian industrial relations. In Transforming industrial relations, eds M. Easson and J. Shaw, 117-30. Sydney : Pluto Press.
9.
Dabscheck, B.1998. The waterfront dispute: Of vendetta and theAustralian way. Economic and Labour Relations Review9: 155-87.
10.
Industrial Relations Taskforce Victoria.2000 . Independent Report of the Victorian Industrial Relations Taskforce. Part 1: Report and recommendations (McCallum Report). Victoria: Victorian Industrial Relations Taskforce .
11.
Jobsback! The federal coalition's industrial relations policy. (1992). mimeo.
12.
Klare, K.E.1978. Judicial deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the origins of modern legal consciousness, 1937-1941. Minnesota Law Review62: 265-339.
13.
McCallum, R.C.1994. The internationalisation of Australian industrial law: The Industrial Relations Reform Act 1992. Sydney Law Review16: 122-35.
14.
Meyers, J.2000. Orwell: Wintery conscience of a generation. New York: W.W. Norton.
15.
Naughton, R.1995. Bargaining in good faith. In Enterprise bargaining, trade unions and the law, eds P. Ronfeldt and R. McCallum, 84-106. Sydney : Federation Press.
16.
Office of the Employment Advocate.2000. What is the current status of AWAs?http://www.oea.gov.au .
17.
Pittard, M.1998. Victorian industrial relations: From deregulation to devolution . In The Australasian labour law reforms: Australia and New Zeland at the end of the twentieth century, ed. D.R. Nolan, 172-89. Sydney: Federation Press.
18.
Reith, P.1999a. Getting the outsiders inside - towards a national workplace relations system in Australia. Speech: The National Press Club 24 March.
19.
Reith, P.1999b. The continuing reform of workplace relations: Implementation of More Jobs, Better Pay. Discussion paper, May.
20.
Reith, R.1999c. The protection of employee entitlements in the event of employer insolvency. Ministerial discussion paper, August.
21.
Reith, P.2000a. National scheme to protect employee entitlements. Press release, 8 February.
22.
Reith, P.2000b. Federal government confirms employee entitlements support scheme and not compulsory insurance. Media release, 27 April.
23.
Reith, P.2000c. Pattern bargaining and industrial action. Ministerial information paper, May.
24.
Reith, P.2000d. Feds pay $1 million through EESS. Media release, 12 September.
25.
Reith, P.2000e. Breaking the gridlock: Towards a simpler national workplace relations system, Discussion paper 1: The case for change. October.
26.
Reith, P.2000f. Breaking the gridlock: Towards a simpler national workplace relations system, Discussion paper 2: A new structure. October.
27.
Reith, P.2000g. Breaking the gridlock: Towards a simpler national workplace relations system, Discussion paper 3: A focus on agreement making. November.
28.
Richardson, S.2000. Freedom of association and the meaning of membership: An analysis of the BHP cases. Sydney Law Review22: 435-40.
29.
Riley, J.2000. Individual contracting and collective bargaining in the balance. Australian Journal of Labour Law13: 92-8.
30.
Thornthwaite, L. and Sheldon, P.2000. Employer matters in 1999. Journal of Industrial Relations, 42: 83-108.
31.
de Tocqueville, A.1996. Democracy in America, vol. 1. New York : Alfred A. Knopf.
32.
Trinca, H. and Davies, A.2000. Waterfront: The battle that changed Australia. Sydney: Doubleday.
