Team development at Fisher and Paykel: The introduction of 'Everyday Workplace Teams'

Abstract

This paper reports on the introduction of a team-working initiative at Fisher and Paykel, a manufacturing company in New Zealand. The initiative was based on a vision of 'Everyday Workplace Teams' whereby staff were organised into semi-autonomous teams and the skills and activities of being a team member were promoted as central to the everyday work of staff. Drawing on data from interviews, participant observation and documentation, this paper concludes that the team-working initiative has provided a platform for growth and promoted upskilling and improvement activities in teams. However, several significant lessons were learned about managing the change process, gaining commitment, aligning organisational systems and the applicability of a universal process. Those lessons which may have a wider applicability are highlighted.

Keywords

team-working organisational change kaizen New Zealand

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barker, J.R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive conflict in self managed teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 38: 408-37.

Conti, R.F. and M. Warner. 1994. Taylorism, teams and technology in re-engineering work organisations. New Technology, Work and Employment 9(2): 93-102.

Geary, J. 1995. Work practices: the structure of work. In Industrial relations, ed. P.K. Edwards , 368-96. Oxford : Blackwell .

Imai, M. 1997. Gemba Kaizen : A commonsense, low-cost approach to management . New York: McGraw Hill.

Ingram, H. and T. Desombre. 1999. Teamwork: Comparing academic and practitioners' perceptions. Team Performance Management 16(2): 16-22.

Leede, J. , A. Nijhof and O. Fisscher. 1999. The myth of self managing teams: A reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organisation . Journal of Business Ethics 21(2): 203-15.

Parry, P. , D. Tranfield , S. Smith , M. Foster , and S. Wilson. 1998. Reconfiguring your organisation: a teamwork approach. Team Performance Management 4(4): 166-76.

Rushmer, R. 1997. How do we measure the effectiveness of team building? Is it good enough? Team management systems - a case study. Journal of Management 16(2): 93-110.

Suzaki, K. 1987. The new manufacturing challenge: Techniques for continuous improvement. New York: Free Press .

10.

Tranfield, D. , I. Parry , S. Wilson , S. Smith , and M. Foster. 1998. Teamworked organisational engineering: Getting the most out of team-working. Management Decision 36(6): 378-84.

11.

Wageman, R. 1997. Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams. Organizational Dynamics 26(1): 49-61.

12.

Wright, M. and P. Edwards. 1998. Does team-working work, and if so, why? A case study in the aluminium industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy 19(1): 59-90.