From the Defendant's Seat to the Bar Table

Mack Kathy , ‘Book reviews: Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law by Linda Mulcahy: Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms by Judith Resnik and Dennis Curtis’ (2012) 39 (2) Journal of Law and Society 317, 317.

See generally Neds Robert G , ‘Criminal Defendants: Maintaining the Appearance of Innocence’ (1972) 37 Missouri Law Review 660, 660–6, 669–72.

Miller Julie , ‘A Rights-Based Argument against the Dock’ (2011) 3 Criminal Law Review 216.

Mulcahy Linda , ‘Putting the Defendant in Their Place: Why do we Still use the Dock in Criminal Proceedings?’ (2013) 53 British Journal of Criminology 1139.

Pat Carlen quoted in Brown David , Criminal Laws: Materials and Commentary on Criminal Law and Process in New South Wales (Federation Press, 6th ed, 2015) 297–300 interprets the courtroom as a performative space.

Hall Edward T , The Hidden Dimension (Anchor Books 1966) 108–22.

Garfinkel Harold , ‘Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies’ (1956) 61 American Journal of Sociology 420, 420.

Scott Matthew , ‘Get Rid of the Dock!’ (2015) 179 Criminal Law and Justice Weekly 99, 100; Doerksen Lynal , ‘Out of the Dock and Into the Bar: An Examination of the History and Use of the Prisoner's Dock’ (1989) 32 Criminal Law Quarterly 478, 496; Mulcahy Linda , ‘Architects of Justice: The Politics of Courtroom Design’ (2007) 16 Social and Legal Studies 383, 394.

Miller, above n 3, 219.

Gifford Toney , cited in Mulcahy, above n 4, 1144.

Tait David Rossner Meredith and McKimmie Blake , ‘The Dock on Trial: Courtroom Design and the Presumption of Innocence’ (Paper presented at the Australian Jury Research and Practice Conference, Melbourne, October 2014 and at the London School of Economics Law Event, March 2015).

Langbein John , The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford University Press, 2003) 35.

Miller , above n 3, 220–1.

Mulcahy , above n 4, 1151.