See, eg, more recently Australian Human Rights Commission, Equal before the Law: Towards Disability Justice Strategies (2014); Australian Law Reform Commission (‘ALRC’), Equality, Capacity and Disability in Commonwealth Laws, Report No 124 (2014); NSW Law Reform Commission, People with Cognitive and Mental Health Impairments in the Criminal Justice System: Criminal Responsibility and Consequences, Report No 138 (2013); Senate, Involuntary or Coerced Sterilisation of People with Disabilities in Australia (Senate Community Affairs Committee Secretariat, 2013); Victoria, Inquiry into Access to and Interaction with the Justice System by People with an Intellectual Disability and their Families and Carers: Final Report, Parl Paper No 216 (2013).
2.
ALRC, above n 1.
3.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (‘CRPD’), opened for signature 30 March 2007, 2515 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 May 2008).
4.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No 1 (2014): Article 12: Equal recognition before the law, 11th sess, UN Doc CRPD/C/GC/I (19 May 2014), 3[12]-[13].
5.
Ibid4 [13].
6.
Children and young persons are another category of individuals who might also be denied legal capacity: see, eg, Secretary, Department of Health and Community Services v JWB (1992) 175 CLR 218, 237 (MasonCJDawsonTooheyGaudronJJ), approving Gillick v West Norfolk AHA [1986] AC 112, 183–184 (Lord Scarman).
7.
See, eg, CampbellFiona Kumari, Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009); ShildrickMargrit, Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality (Palgrave Macmillan, 2009); TremainShelley, ‘On the Subject of Impairment’ in CorkerMairianShakespeareTom (eds), Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory (Continuum, 2002) 32.
8.
See, eg, Tremain, above n 7; TremainShelley, ‘Foucault, Governmentality, and Critical Disability Theory: An Introduction’ in TremainShelley (ed), Foucault and the Government of Disability (The University of Michigan Press, 2005).
9.
See, eg, CareyAlison C, On the Margins of Citizenship: Intellectual Disability and Civil Rights in Twentieth-Century America (Temple University Press, 2009); CarlsonLicia, The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Philosophical Reflections (Indiana University Press, 2010); CarlsonLicia, ‘Cognitive Ableism and Disability Studies: Feminist Reflections on the History of Mental Retardation’ (2001) 16(4) Hypatia124; KittayEva FederCarlsonLicia (eds), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010).
10.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171; 1057 UNTS 407 (entered into force 23 March 1976).
11.
MinkowitzTina, ‘Abolishing Mental Health Laws to Comply with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ in McSherryBernadetteWellerPenny (eds), Rethinking Rights-Based Mental Health Laws (Bloomsbury, 2010), 151, 160–162; GoodingPiers, ‘Supported Decision-Making: A Rights-Based Disability Concept and its Implications for Mental Health Law’ (2013) 20(3) Psychiatry, Psychology And Law431.
12.
BeaupertFleurSteeleLinda, Submission No 10 to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Draft General Comment on Article 12 – on Equal Recognition before the Law, 21 February 2014 <http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/DGCArticles12And9.aspx>.
13.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No 1 (2014), above n 4.
14.
Ibid3 [7].
15.
Ibid3 [9].
16.
Ibid4 [13].
17.
Ibid4 [14].
18.
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Declarations and Reservations (Australia), opened for signature 30 March 2007, 2515 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 May 2008).
See, eg, Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 (Vic), ss 42E, 42H, 60AI; Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 4(a), 46A.
24.
ALRC, above n 1, 81.
25.
Ibid 76. This approach, however, has also been subject to criticism: eg, Centre for Disability Law and Policy (NUI Galway), Submission No 130 to the Australian Law Reform Commission, Equality, Capacity and Disability in Commonwealth Laws Australia (DP 81), (2014), 10 <http://www.alrc.gov.au/inquiries/disability/submissions>.
26.
ALRC, above n 1, 87.
27.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No 1 (2014), above n 4, 5 [21].
28.
For example, PerkinsElizabeth, Decision-Making in Mental Health Review Tribunals (Aldershot, 2003) 104–108; PerlinMichael L, ‘Sanism and the law’ (2013) 15(10) AMA Journal of Ethics13 <journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2013/10/msoc1-1310.html>.
29.
For example, ALRC, above n 1, 268.
30.
ALRC, above n 1, 73.
31.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No 1 (2014), above n 4, 4 [15].
32.
ALRC, above n 1, 74.
33.
BeaupertGoodingSteele, above n 20, 4.
34.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No 1 (2014), above n 4, 4 [14].
35.
BeaupertGoodingSteele, above n 20, 7.
36.
A similar process (‘circularity in assessing the criterion of mental illness’) was observed to be of concern in relation to Australian mental health tribunal decision-making by a recent Australian Research Council funded study: CarneyTerry, Australian Mental Health Tribunals: Space for Fairness, Freedom, Protection & Treatment (Themis Press, 2011), 232.
37.
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No 1 (2014), above n 4, 6 [25] (emphasis added).
38.
ALRC, above n 1, 280, 288.
39.
Ibid278.
40.
See Mental Health Act 2014 (WA); Mental Health Act 2014 (Vic).