McPheetersCharles, ‘Leading Horses to Water: May Courts Which Have the Power to Order Attendance at Mediation Also Require Good-Faith Negotiation — Decker v Lindsay’ (1992) 2Journal of Dispute Resolution15.
3.
Alton Australia Pty Ltd v Transfield Pty Ltd (1999) 153 FLR 156.
4.
378 US 184 (1964) (StewartJustice).
5.
See, eg, Gateway Realty v Arton Holdings Ltd (No 3) (1991) 106 NSR (2d) 180, Capolingua v Phylum (1991) 5 WAR 137, Western Australia v Taylor (Njamal People) (1996) 134 FLR 211.
KovachKimberlee, ‘Good Faith in Mediation: Requested, recommended, or required? A new ethic’ (1997) South Texas Law Review575, 612.
10.
DouglasSusan, ‘Neutrality in Mediation: A Study of Mediator Perceptions’ (2008) 8(1) Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal139.
11.
BogdanoskiTony, ‘The “Neutral” Mediator's Perennial Dilemma: To Intervene or Not to Intervene?’ (2009) 9(1) Queensland University of Technology Law & Justice Journal26, 29.
12.
GrayBronwen, ‘Mediation as a Post-Modern Practice: A Challenge to the Cornerstones of Mediation's Legitimacy’ (2006) 17(4) Australasian Dispute Resolution Journal208, 215.
13.
Douglas, above n 10, 149.
14.
Aiton Australia Pty Ltd v Transfield Pty Ltd (1999) 153 FLR 236 [129] (EinsteinJ).
15.
BaylisClaireCarrollRobyn, ‘The Nature and Importance of Mechanisms for Addressing Power Differences in Statutory Mediation’ (2001) 14(2) Bond Law Review285, 306.
16.
FieldRachael, ‘Federal Family Law Reform in 2005: The problems and pitfalls for women and children of an increased emphasis on post-separation informal dispute resolution’ (2005) 5Queensland University of Technology Law and Justice Journal28, 69.
17.
BaylisCarroll, above n 15.
18.
Family Law Regulations 1984 (Cth) Reg 62(2)(c).
19.
HiderJane, ‘Compulsory Mediation’ (1998) 62Australian Construction Law Newsletter11.