WollBencieSutton-SpenceRachelEltonFrances, ‘Multilingualism: The Global Approach to Sign Languages’ in LucasCeil, (ed), The Sociolinguistics of Sign Languages (Cambridge University Press, 2001) 8–32.
2.
LaddPaddy, Understanding Deaf Culture: In Search of Deafhood (Multilingual Matters, 2003).
3.
See generally, JohnstonTrevor, ‘W(h)ither the Deaf community? Population, Genetics and the Future of Auslan (Australian Sign Language)’ (2003) 148(5) American Annals of the Deaf358.
4.
JohnstonTrevorSchembriAdam, Australian Sign Language (Auslan): An Introduction to Sign Linguistics (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
5.
NapierJeminaMcKeeRachelGoswellDella, Sign Language Interpreting: Theory & Practice in Australia and New Zealand (Federation Press, 2nd ed, 2010).
6.
BrunsonJeremy, ‘Your Case Will Now be Heard: Sign Language Interpreters as Problematic Accommodations in Legal Interactions’ (2008) Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education13.
7.
CharrowVedaCharrowRobert, ‘Characteristics of the Language of Jury Instruction’ in AlatisJames ETuckerG Richard, (eds), Language in Public Life (Georgetown University Press, 1979) 163–185.
8.
FarrellMichael, ‘Allowing Deaf People to Serve as Jurors: An Irish Perspective’ (2011) 42Discrimination Law Association Briefings30, 30–1.
9.
See further, Australian Association of the Deaf Inc, ‘Around the First Deaf Person to Serve on Jury – New Zealand’ (2005) 14(11) Outlook1, 3 <http://www.deafau.org.au/upload/Outlook_200512.pdf>; New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Blind or Deaf Jurors, Report 114 (September 2006) 43.
10.
US v Dempsey 830 F 2d 1084 (1987); People v Guzman 478 NYS 2d 455 (1984).
11.
People v Guzman 478 NYS 2d 455 (1984) 474 (GoodmanJ).
12.
HeffernanCathy, ‘Stop Stonewalling Deaf Jurors’, The Guardian (London), 20 July 2010.
Lyons v State of Queensland (No 2) [2013] QCAT 731.
17.
DibbenKay, ‘Deaf Woman Sues State Government after being Excluded from Jury Duty’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 5 June 2013; DibbenKay, ‘Deaf Woman Gaye Prudence Lyons Appeals Ruling over Jury Exclusion’, Courier Mail (Brisbane), 13 January 2014.
18.
NSW Law Reform Commission, above n 9, Recommendation 1(a).
19.
NapierJeminaSpencerDavidSabolcecJoe, NSVVLRC Research Report No 14, Guilty or Not Guilty? An Investigation of Deaf Jurors' Access to Court Proceedings via Sign Language Interpreting, 2007, 47.
20.
Ibid52.
21.
Ibid42.
22.
NapierJemina, ‘Legal Interpreting, Deaf People and Jury Service: A Happy Union?’ (2013) (December Issue) Newsli: Magazine of the Association of Sign Language Interpreters of the UK6.
23.
Ibid.
24.
NapierJeminaSpencerDavid, ‘Guilty or Not Guilty? An Investigation of Deaf Jurors' Access to Court Proceedings via Sign Language Interpreting’ in RussellDebraHaleSandra, (eds), Interpreting in Legal Settings (Gallaudet University Press, 2008) 71.
25.
Project no: ARCLP8201200237. Researchers: Professor Sandra Hale and Dr Mehera San Roque, UNSW; Professor David Spencer, ACU; Professor Deborah Russell, University of Alberta; and Professor Jemina Napier, Heriot-Watt University.