This issue also raises questions of constitutional validity. In particular, s 116 of the Constitution, see, eg, GrayAnthony, Religious freedom and Section 116 of the Australian Constitution: Would a banning of the hijab or burqa be constitutionally valid? (2011) 2Forum on Public Policy1.
5.
CampoJuan Eduardo, Encyclopaedia of Islam (Infobase Publishing, 2009) 119.
See, eg, AllenRogerToorawaShawkat M, Islam: A Short Guide to the Faith (Wm B Eerdmans Publishing, 2011); JoppkeChristianTorpeyJohn, Legal Integration of Islam (Harvard University Press, 2013) 130; BennettClinton, Studying Islam (A&C Black, 2010) 100.
10.
EmonAnver MEllisMarkGlahnBenjamin, Islamic Law and International Human Rights Law (Oxford University Press, 2012) 54.
11.
Ibid.
12.
Ibid55.
13.
Ibid.
14.
An-Na'imAbdullahi A, ‘A Review of the International Centre for the Legal Protection of Human Rights’ (1996) 10(1) Interights Bulletin3.
15.
Ibid.
16.
Ibid.
17.
The Qur'an, Sura An-Nur, Verse 31.
18.
AzarTabariYeganehNahid, In the Shadow of Islam: The Women's Movement in Iran (Zed, 1982) 23.
19.
MishalAA, ‘Effects of Different Dress Styles on Vitamin D Levels in Healthy Young Jordanian Women’ (2001) 12(11) Osteoporosis International931–935.
20.
CheslerPhyllis, ‘Ban the Burqa? The Argument in Favor’ (2010) 17(4) Middle East Quarterly33–45.
21.
Ibid.
22.
ArmajaniJon, Dynamic Islam: Liberal Muslim Perspectives in a Transnational Age (University Press of America, 2004) 13.
23.
RahmanFazlur, Islam (University of Chicago Press, 1966) 39.
24.
EbadiShirin, Iran Awakening: A Memoir of Revolution and Hope (Random House, 2009) 191.
25.
Ibid.
26.
AslanReza, No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam (Random House Digital, 2011) 65.
27.
Ibid.
28.
Ibid.
29.
Ibid66.
30.
AhmedAkbar SDonnanHastings, Islam, Globalization and Postmodernity (Routledge, 1994) 192–3.
31.
MernissiFatima, Beyond the Veil: Male-Female Dynamics in Modern Muslim Society (Indiana University Press, 1987) 19.
32.
SAS v France [GC], no 43835/11, Judgment of 1 July 2014.
33.
NigraRaffaella, The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Islamic Veil' (2010) 4Human Rights Review531.
See, eg, BartonDaniel‘The ECHR's upholding of the French face-veil ban sets a very worrying precedent for the freedom of religious expression’ on Democratic Audit Blog (24 July 2014) <http://eprints.Ise.ac.uk/59128/>.
36.
ECtHR, SAS v France [GC], no 43835/11, Judgment of 1 July 2014 (joint partly dissenting opinion of Judges Nussberger and Jaderblom), para 2.
The ICCPR has been given effect in the ACT and Victoria via the Human Rights Act2004 and the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act2006, respectively. On Australia's compliance see, <http://nemedy.org.au/>.
42.
UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (1989).
43.
BremsEvaGillerDavid, ‘Face veil Bans in the European Court of Human Rights: The Importance of Empirical Findings’ (2014) 22(2) Journal of Law and Policy517.
44.
TissotSylvie, ‘Excluding Muslim Women: From Hijab to Niqab, from School to Public Space’ (2011) 23(1) Public Culture43.
45.
JosephSarahCastanMelissa, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Material & Commentary (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed, 2013) 567.
46.
Raihon Hudoyberganova v Uzbekistan, Human Rights Committee, Communication No 931/2000, UN Doc CCPR/C/82/D/931/2000 (18 January 2005) [6.2].
47.
NanwaniShaira, ‘Comment: The Burqa Ban: An Unreasonable Limitation on Religious Freedom or a Justifiable Restriction?’ (2011) 25Emory International Law Review1456–57.