BixBrian, Jurisprudence Theory and Context (Carolina Academic Press, 6th ed, 2012) 132.
6.
FaunceThomas, ‘Planetary Medicine and the Waitangi Tribunal Whanganui River Report: Global Health Law Embracing Ecosystems as Patients’ (2013) 20Journal of Law and Medicine528, 529.
Ruruku Whakatupua – Te Mana o Te Awa Tupua, above n 1, 2.1.
9.
While in September 2008 Ecuador recognised the rights of nature in its constitution, and the rights of nature were recognised at the World Peoples' Conference on Climate Change and Rights of Mother Earth, neither has specifically granted legal personhood to nature or a natural object within nature.
10.
NaffineNgaire, ‘Legal Personality and the Natural World: On the Persistence of the Human Measure of Value’ (2012) 3Journal of Human Rights and the Environment68, 69.
11.
Ibid69.
12.
StoneChristopher D, ‘Response to Commentators’ (2012) 3Journal of Human Rights and the Environment100,116.
13.
Ibid100.
14.
Ibid116.
15.
See, eg, BurdonPeter (ed), Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence (Wakefield Press, 2011).
16.
Naffine, above n 10,78.
17.
NaffineNgaire, Law's Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person (Hart Publishing, 2009) 12.
18.
NicholasBarry, An Introduction to Roman Law (Clarendon Press, 1962) 60.
19.
Naffine, above n 17, 13.
20.
Ibid; Stone, above n 12, 31.
21.
Naffine, above n 17, 11.
22.
Naffine, above n 10, 83.
23.
HsiaoElaine C, ‘Whanganui River Agreement – Indigenous Rights and Rights of Nature’ (2013) 42Environmental Policy and Law371, 374.
24.
Stone, above n 12, 100.
25.
Ruruku Whakatupua – Te Mana o Te Awa Tupua, above n 1, 2.1.
LiptonPhillipHerzbergAbeWelshMichelle, Understanding Company Law (Thompson Reuters, 16th ed, 2010) 3.
34.
Ibid.
35.
Naffine, above n 17, 16.
36.
FagundesDavid, ‘Note, What We Talk About When We Talk About Persons: The Language of a Legal Fiction’ (2001) 114(6) Harvard Law Review1746, 1753
37.
AmaoOlufemi, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Contract, Corporate Personhood and Human Rights Law: Understanding the Emerging Responsibilities of Modern Corporations’ (2008) 33Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy111,115.
38.
Ibid110.
39.
Ibid.
40.
Ruruku Whakatupua – Te Mana o Te Awa Tupua, above n 1.
41.
Naffine, above n 17, 48.
42.
WerhanePatricia, Persons, Rights and Corporations (Loyola University of Chicago1985) 32.
43.
Ruruku Whakatupua – Te Mana o Te Awa Tupua, above n 1; Faunce, above n 6, 534.
44.
Ruruku Whakatupua – Te Mana o Te Awa Tupua, above n 1, 6.1
45.
Ruruku Whakatupua – Te Mana o Te Awa Tupua above n 1; MunzerStephen, A Theory of Property (Cambridge University Press, 1990) 25.
46.
Naffine, above n 17, 13.
47.
Munzer, above n 45, 18–22.
48.
Faunce, above n 6, 533–534.
49.
Ruruku Whakatupua – Te Mana o Te Awa Tupua, above n 1, 6.11.2
50.
Ibid 6.11.1
51.
ChronicleWhanganui, above n 31.
52.
StoneChristopher D, ‘Should Trees have Standing? Law, Morality and the Environment’ (Oxford University Press, 3rd ed.2010) 6.
53.
BurdonPeter, ‘The Rights of Nature: Reconsidered’ (2010) 49Australian Humanities Review69, 79.
