GilBegoña Maria-Tomé, ‘Moving Towards Eco-unionism: Reflecting the Spanish Experience’ in RäthzelNoraUzzellDavid (eds), Trade Unions in the Green Economy: Working for the Environment (Routledge, 2013) 64, 71.
2.
Ibid65.
3.
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters38ILM517(1999), finalised 25 June 1998 (entered into force 30 October 2001) (‘Aarhus Convention’).
4.
Gil, above n 1, 71.
5.
Ibid.
6.
RäthzelUzzell, above n 1.
7.
StecStephenCasey-LefkowitzSusan, The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide (United Nations, 2000) 19.
UN Doc A/CONF.151/26 (vols. I-III) (1992), [ch 23.2].
10.
See Aarhus Convention, above n 3.
11.
FisherDoug, ‘The Impact of International Law upon the Australian Environmental Legal System’ (1999) 16Environmental and Planning Law Journal372, 384.
12.
RichardsonBenjamin JRazzaqueJona, ‘Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making’ in RichardsonBenjaminWoodStepan (eds), Environmental Law For Sustainability (Hart Publishing, 2006) 165, 175–176.
13.
SnellDarrynFairbrotherPeter, ‘Unions as Environmental Actors’ (2010) 16(3) Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research411, 412.
14.
ThorpeAmelia, ‘Public Participation in Planning: Lessons from the Green Bans’ (2013) 30(2) Environmental and Planning Law Journal93–105.
15.
Ibid96–97.
16.
Conservation and protection are used interchangeably in environmental law. However, conservation measures involve positive duties to enhance the quality of the environment. Environmental protection refers to preventing destructing activities.
RäthzelNoraUzzellDavid, Trade Unions and Climate Change: The Jobs versus Environment Dilemma’ (2011) 21Global Environmental Change1215
19.
SnellFairbrother, above n 13.
20.
LambropoulosVictoria, ‘Greening Australian Workplaces: Workers and the Environment’ (2009) 34(3) Alternative Law Journal189–192.
21.
SnellFairbrother, above n 13, 412;
22.
Ibid.
23.
Ibid.
24.
Ibid416.
25.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 19(3).
26.
AnnanKoff, Foreword in Stec and Casey-Lefkowitz, above n 7.
27.
StecCasey-Leftkowitz, above n 7, 5.
28.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 2(3).
29.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 2(3).
30.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 2(3).
31.
Ibid art 4(2).
32.
Ibid.
33.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 2(3).
34.
Ibid art 2(3)(b).
35.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 2(3)(c).
36.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 2(3)(c).
37.
Ibid art 4(3)(a)–(h).
38.
AbbotJohnMarohasyJennifer, ‘Barriers to Accessing Environmental Information under Australian Freedom of Information’ (2013) 24(1) Public Law Review10–16.
39.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3.
40.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 4(4)(d).
41.
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth), s 45.
42.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 4(4).
43.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 6(8).
44.
LeeMariaAbbotCarolyn, ‘The Usual Suspects? Public Participation Under the Aarhus Convention’ (2003) 66(1) Modern Law Review80, 97.
45.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 6(9).
46.
ReichelJane, ‘Judicial Control in a Globalised Legal Order – A One Way Track? An Analysis of the Case C-263/08 Djurgarden – Lilla Vartan’ (2010) 3(2) Review of European Administrative Law69, 71.
MonsmaDavid, ‘Equal Rights, Governance, and the Environment: Integrating Environmental Justice Principles in Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2006) 33(2) Ecology Law Quarterly443.
54.
Ibid446.
55.
LeeMaria, EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making (Hart Publishing, 2005) 157.
56.
Commission v Ireland C-216/05 [2006] ECR I-10787.
57.
Aarhus Convention, above n 3, art 9(2).
58.
Ibid.
59.
See discussion in Stec and Casey-Lefkowitz, above n 7, 129.
