Re Bolton; Ex parte Beane (1987) 162CLR514, 523 (BrennanJ)(‘Re Bolton’).
2.
See Sir SalesPhilip, ‘A Comparison of the Principle of Legality and Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998’ (2009) 125Law Quarterly Review598.
3.
(1908) 7CLR277, 304 (footnotes omitted).
4.
Ibid305.
5.
GeiringerClaudia, ‘The Principle of Legality and the Bill of Rights Act: A Critical Examination of R v Hansen’ (2008) 6(1) New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law59, 88.
6.
See GleesonMurray, ‘The Meaning of Legislation: Context, Purpose and Respect for Fundamental Rights’ (2009) 20(1) Public Law Review26, 33–34.
7.
Ibid34.
8.
GeartyConor, Can Human Rights Survive? (Cambridge University Press, 2006) 25–28.
9.
See, eg, in Australia: Plaintiff s 157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211CLR476, 492 (GleesonCJ); in New Zealand: R v Pora [2001] 2 NZLR 37, 50 [53] (EliasCJ); in the UK: R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Pierson [1998] AC 539, 573–575 (Lord Browne-Wilkinson).
10.
See MeagherDan, ‘The Common Law Presumption of Consistency with International Law: Some Observations from Australia (and Comparisons with New Zealand)’ [2012] New Zealand Law Review465, 479–481.
11.
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Ex parte Simms [2000] 2AC115, 131–132 (‘Ex parte Simms’).
‘Protecting Human Rights Without a Bill of Rights'’ (Speech delivered at the John Marshall Law School, Chicago, 26 January 2010) 26–27
35.
(2011) 245CLR1, 177 (‘Momcilovic’).
36.
See MeagherDan, ‘The Principle of Legality in the Age of Rights’ (2011) 35Melbourne University Law Review449, 456–459.
37.
DoyleJ J, ‘Common Law Rights and Democratic Rights’ in FinnPaul D, (ed), Essays on Law and Government: Volume 1 Principles and Values (Law Book Company, 1995) 149.
38.
Sales, above n 2, 605.
39.
DyzenhausDavidHuntMurrayTaggartMichael, ‘The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalisation as Constitutionalisation’ (2001) 1(1) Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal5, 6.
40.
Ibid33 (footnotes omitted).
41.
‘Oil and Water? International Law and Domestic Law in Australia’ (Speech delivered at the Brennan Lecture, Bond University, 26 June 2009) 21
Project Blue Sky v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194CLR355, 384 (McHughGummowKirbyHayneJJ)(my emphasis).
46.
See AronsonMark, ‘Statutory Interpretation or Judicial Disobedience?’United Kingdom Constitutional Law Blog (1 June 2013) <http://ukconstitutionallaw.org>.
47.
Sales, above n 2, 605.
48.
[2013] HCA29 (26 June 2013) [70] (HayneBellJJ), [157] (KiefelJ).
49.
Ibid [86] (HayneBellJJ).
50.
Ibid [87], see also [158]–[160] (KiefelJ).
51.
See R v Janceski (2005) ALR580, 591 (SpigelmanCJ); Malika Holdings Pty Ltd v Stretton (2001) 204CLR290, 298 (McHughJ).
52.
Spigelman, above n 18, 43.
53.
X7[2013] HCA 29 (26 June 2013) [87] (HayneBellJJ),
54.
See Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239CLR531.