BertotJohn CarloJaegerPaul THansenDerek, The Impact of Polices [sic] on Government Social Media Usage: Issues, Challenges, and Recommendations’ (2012) 29Government Information Quarterly30, 30.
See, eg, AIJA Public Information Officers' Conferences, ‘Courts Interacting with the Public’ (30 March 2012, Brisbane) and (30 April 2010, Melbourne).
5.
BertotJohn Carlo, ‘Engaging the Public in Open Government: The Policy and Government Application of Social Media Technology for Government Transparency’ (2010) 44(11) IEEE Computer53.
6.
Australian Government, Attorney-General's Department, A Strategic Framework for Access to Justice in the Federal Civil Justice System (September 2009).
7.
Australian Government, Attorney-General's Department, The Justice Statement (1995) ch 4.
8.
Ibid.
9.
de JerseyPaul, ‘Courts and the Media in the Digital Era’ in KeyzerPatrickJohnstonJanePearsonMark (ed), The Courts and the Media: Challenges in the Era of Digital and Social Media (Halstead Press, 2012) 35.
10.
BertotJohn CJaegerPaul TGrimesJustin M, ‘Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency’ (2010) 27Government Information Quarterly264.
See further Casero-RipollésAndreu, ‘Beyond Newspapers: News Consumption among Young People in the Digital Era’ (2012) 39Comunicar151.
13.
However, note that other bodies could also fulfill this educative role, such as (in Victoria) the Judicial College of Victoria, the Sentencing Council of Victoria and the Law Foundation of Victoria.
14.
McLachlinBeverley, ‘The Relationship between the Courts and the News Media’ in Keyzer, above n 9, 24, 28.
For the factors that influence Internet use in Australia see WillisSuzanneTranterBruce K, ‘Beyond the “Digital Divide”: Internet Diffusion and Inequality in Australia’ (2006) 42(1) Journal of Sociology43.
19.
ChestersJennyRyanChrisSinningMathias, Older Australians and the Take-Up of New Technologies (NCVER, 2013).
HowardAnne, Connecting with Communities: How Local Government is Using Social Media to Engage with Citizens (ANZSOG Institute for Governance/ACELG, 2012) 38–40.
30.
Keyzer, above n 24, 6; JohnstonJane, ‘Courts' New Visibility’ in Keyzer, above n 9, 41, 49; WilliamsGeorge, ‘The High Court and the Media’ (1999) 1UTS Law Review136.
31.
Johnston, above n 30, 50–54.
32.
According to the Federal Circuit Court, it has opened a Twitter account to ensure the Court has its preferred Twitter name (or ‘handle’) if it later decides to start tweeting: Email from Denise Healy to the author, 2 May 2013
Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Parliament of Australia, Response to Attorney-General's Department Portfolio Question No 141.
45.
Australian Public Service Commission, Revisions to the Commission's Guidance on Making Public Comment and Participating Online (Circular 2012/1, 2012).
