Attorney-General (SA) v Corporation of the City of Adelaide [2013] HCA3.
2.
Monis v The Queen [2013] HCA4.
3.
Wotton v Queensland [2012] HCA2.
4.
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177CLR1 and Australian Capital Television v Commonwealth (1992) 177CLR106, as modified by Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189CLR520; and Coleman v Power (2004) 220CLR1.
5.
GelberKatharine, ‘Pedestrian Malls and Local Government Powers: Political Speech at Risk’ (2003) 5UTS Law Review48. See further Gelber, Speech Matters: Getting Free Speech Right (UQP, 2011).
6.
Attorney-General (SA) v Corporation of the City of Adelaide [2013] HCA3, [67] FrenchCJ).
7.
Ibid [64].
8.
Ibid [218] (Crennan and Kiefel JJ).
9.
For example, McGinty v Western Australia (1996) 186CLR140; Levy v Victoria (1997) 198CLR579.
10.
Attorney-General (SA) v Corporation of the City of Adelaide [2013] HCA3, [220] (Crennan and Kiefel JJ).
11.
(1996) 186CLR140, where it was unsuccessfully argued that electoral boundaries in Western Australia infringed on a guarantee of voter equality.
12.
Attorney-General for the State of South Australia v The Corporation of the City of Adelaide [2012] HCATrans233.
13.
Gelber (2003), above n 5.
14.
Ibid55.
15.
Ibid55.
16.
Coleman v Sellars (2001) 181ALR120, 120–121.
17.
Gelber, above n 5, citing Coleman v Sellars (2001) 181ALR120, at 121 and 124.
18.
Coleman v Sellars & Anor B14/2001 (26 June 2002) High Court of Australia Transcript.
Monis v The Queen; Droudis v The Queen [2012] HCATrans238.
29.
Monis v The Queen; Droudis v The Queen [2012] HCATrans241.
30.
Coleman v Power (2004) 220CLR1.
31.
ChestermanJohn, ‘What “Right” to Free Speech?’ (2004) 29Alternative Law Journal255; ArcioniElisa, ‘Developments in Free Speech Law in Australia: Coleman and Mulholland’ (2005) 33Federal Law Review1–22.
32.
Monis v The Queen [2013] HCA4, [88] (HayneJ).
33.
Ibid [106].
34.
Ibid [196]–[202].
35.
Ibid [339].
36.
Ibid [333].
37.
Ibid [291].
38.
Ibid [310].
39.
Ibid [310].
40.
Ibid [311].
41.
HumeDavid, ‘Wotton v Queensland – ‘Islands of Power’ and Political Speech on Palm Island’ [2012] UNSWLRS39; WicksAlisa, ‘Due process and parole in Queensland: The case of Lex Wotton’ (2010) 7(20) Indigenous Law Bulletin13.
42.
On 26 November 2004, about 400 Aboriginal residents of Palm Island stormed the island's police station. It was a week after Doomadgee, a 36-year-old worker and father, was found dead in a police cell, just an hour after he had been locked up, unlawfully, for the minor offence of ‘causing a public nuisance’. The protest was triggered by the belated release of an autopsy report indicating Doomadgee had died of internal bleeding after his liver was torn in half, his spleen ruptured and four ribs broken by a heavy blow. See Wicks, above n 41, and HooperChloe, The Tall Man (Penguin, 2009).
43.
Wotton v Queensland [2012] HCA2
44.
Ibid [58]–[65].
45.
Ibid [31] (FrenchCJGummowHayneCrennanBellJJ).
46.
Ibid [14].
47.
Ibid [25]–[32], [89].
48.
Ibid [31]–[32].
49.
Ibid [30], citing a distinction drawn in Hogan v Hinch (2011) 243CLR506 at 555–556.
Gelber, above n 5, citing KirbyMichael, ‘Freedom of Expression: Some Recent Developments’ (1993) 19(4) Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 1178–1781.
56.
Gelber, above n 5, citing McDonaldLeighton, ‘The Denizens of Democracy: The High Court and the “Free Speech” Cases’ (1994) 5Public Law Review160–198.
57.
StoneAdrienne, ‘Lange, Levy and the Direction of the Freedom of Political Communication under the Australian Constitution’ (1998) 21UNSW Law Journal, 117–134, 117.
58.
(1994) 1982CLR104.
59.
(1994) 182CLR211. The WA Constitution was also held to contain the same inherent need for freedom of political communication as the Commonwealth's.
60.
See now also Banerji v Bowles [2013] FCCA1052, where it was held that a federal public servant is not protected from dismissal for criticising, even anonymously, government refugee policies.
61.
WilliamsGeorge, Human Rights under the Australian Constitution (OUP, 2002) 168.
62.
(1997) 198CLR579.
63.
HeadMichael, ‘Detention Without Trial – A Threat to Democratic Rights’ (2005) 9(1) UWS Law Review33.
64.
HeadMichael, ‘Global Governance Implications of Terrorism: Using UN Resolutions to Justify Abuse of Basic Rights’ in HeadMannKozlina (eds), Transnational Governance: Emerging Models of Global Legal Regulation (Ashgate, 2012) 179–209.