LockeJohn, Two Treatises of Government (first published, 1689).
5.
Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1029, 1066 (Lord Camden LCJ).
6.
Blackstone, above n 3.
7.
SingerJoseph William, ‘The Ownership Society and Takings of Property: Castles, Investments and Just Obligations’ (2006) 30Harvard Environmental Law Review309, 314.
Introduced by Senator Larissa Waters on 24 August 2011.
10.
Blackstone, above n 3. See the recent discussion on the application of the doctrine to strata below the surface in Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK Onshore Ltd [2010] 3 WLR 654.
11.
Case of Mines (1567) 1 Plowd 310; 75 ER 472.
12.
Mineral Resources Act 1989 (Qld) s 8; Petroleum Act 1923 (Qld) s 9.
See, eg, Water Act 2000 (Qld) s 206, on the granting of licences to owners of land to take water from that land or to interfere with its flow.
16.
BurdonPeter, ‘Towards an Earth-Friendly Legal System’ (2009) 19(12) Eureka Street20.
17.
BurdonPeter, ‘Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence’ (2010) 35(2) Alternative Law Journal62, 63.
18.
For example, Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 (Qld) s 495 requires only an entry notice to precede entry to land for preliminary and certain advanced activities. ‘Advanced activities’ require a conduct and compensation agreement under Ch 5, Pt 5.
19.
RoartyMichael, ‘The Development of Australia's Coal Seam Gas Resources’, (Background Note, Parliament of Australia, July 2011).
20.
Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 (Qld) s 3(1)(a).
21.
Ibid s 3(1)(h).
22.
Ibid s 3(1)(j).
23.
RadinMargaret Jane, Reinterpreting Property (University of Chicago Press, 1993) 7.
24.
Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004 (Qld) s 295.
25.
The Code is created under the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Regulations 2004 (Qld) s 4A.
26.
Land Access Code (November 2010) 3.
27.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175CLR1; Wik Peoples v Queensland (1996) 187 CLR 1.
28.
KuhnRick, ‘Xenophobic Racism and Class during the Howard Years’ (2009) 1Marxist Interventions53.
29.
‘A basic doctrine of the land law is the doctrine of tenure … and it is a doctrine which could not be overturned without fracturing the skeleton which gives our land law its shape and consistency’: Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1, [47].
de Paiva DuarteFernanda‘The Environment and Development Debate: Paradoxes, Polemics and Panaceas’ (1999) 8(2) Griffith Law Review258, 261.
35.
Burdon, above n 16, 21.
36.
Ibid.
37.
HillmanMick, ‘Environmental Justice: A Crucial Link Between Environmentalism and Community Development?’ (2002) 37(4) Community Development Journal349, 356.