BoltAndrew, ‘It's so hip to be black’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 15 April 2009; BoltAndrew, ‘White fellas in the black’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 21 August 2009.
3.
See Eatock v Bolt, [196]–[211].
4.
It may also be noted that Article 20 of the ICCPR (and Article 4 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination) require States to prohibit racial hate speech. As noted, the Bolt decision did not explicitly concern racial vilification.
5.
Eatock v Bolt, [16]
6.
Eatock v Bolt, [171]
7.
Eatock v Bolt, [362]
8.
Eatock v Bolt, [444]
9.
Eatock v Bolt, [323]–[324]
10.
Eatock v Bolt, [267]
11.
Eatock v Bolt, [267]
12.
Eatock v Bolt, [267]
13.
Eatock v Bolt, [295]
14.
Eatock v Bolt, [151]
15.
Eatock v Bolt, [296]
16.
Eatock v Bolt, [350]
17.
Eatock v Bolt, see [193]
18.
See text at note 5 above.
19.
Eatock v Bolt, [360]
20.
Eatock v Bolt, [362]
21.
Eatock v Bolt, [367]
22.
See ‘Andrew Bolt: Australia's least accurate columnist?’, The Sunday Age (Melbourne), 2 October 2011, 5.
23.
Eatock v Bolt, [388]
24.
Eatock v Bolt, [405]
25.
Eatock v Bolt, [425]
26.
Eatock v Bolt, [444]
27.
Eatock v Bolt, [423]
28.
MarrDavid, ‘In black and white, Andrew Bolt trifled with the facts’, The Age (Melbourne), 29 September 2011.
29.
Bolt, 15 April 2009, above n 2.
30.
Eatock v Bolt, [36]
31.
BoltAndrew, ‘Silencing me impedes unity’, Herald Sun (Melbourne), 29 September 2011.
