HarrisCathleenVerpMarion, ‘Prenatal Testing and Interventions’ in MahowaldMary. (eds), Genetics in the Clinic: Clinical, Ethical, and Social Implications for Primary Care (2001) 59, 60.
2.
HolmSøren, ‘The Expressivist Objection to Prenatal Diagnosis: Can it be laid to Rest?’ (2008) 34Journal of Medical Ethics24.
3.
GreenhalghSusanWinklerEdwin, Governing China's Population: From Leninist to Neoliberal Biopolitics (2005); WhiteTyrene, China's Longest Campaign: Birth Planning in the Peoples Republic, 1949–2005 (2005); ScharpingThomas, Birth Control in China 1949–2000: Population Policy and Demographic Development (2003).
4.
RodgersGail, ‘Yin and Yang: The Eugenic Policies of the United States and China: Is the Analysis that Black and White?’(1999) 22Houston Journal of International Law129, 152.
5.
LiaoCanLiDong-Zhi, ‘Pregnancy Outcome Following Prenatal Diagnosis of Sex Chromosome Abnormalities in Mainland China’ (2008) 28Prenatal Diagnosis443.
6.
MurphyRachel, ‘Turning Peasants into Modern Chinese Citizens: “Population Quality” Discourse, Demographic Transition and Primary Education’ (2004) The China Quarterly1, 2.
7.
AnagnostAnn, ‘The Corporeal Politics of Quality (Suzhi)’ (2004) 16(2) Public Culture189, 197. See also KipnisAndrew, ‘Suzhi: A Keyword Approach’ (2006) China Journal295; AnagnostAnn, National Past-times: Narrative, Representation and Power in Modern China (1997); JackaTamara, Rural Women in Urban China: Gender, Migration and Social Change (2006).
8.
MurphyRachel, ‘Turning Peasants into Modern Chinese Citizens: “Population Quality” Discourse, Demographic Transition and Primary Education’ (2004) The China Quarterly1, 2. [In China] there has been a move away from coercive population planning methods towards providing incentives for compliance, as well as a shift in emphasis of the family planning policy from quantity to quality.
9.
Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 67 ALJR 47; Malette v Schulman (1990) 67 DLR (4th) 321.
10.
Transplant and Anatomy Act 1978 (ACT); Patient Information and Consent to Medical Treatment Guidelines (NSW) and Guidelines for Newborn Screening (NSW); Criminal Code 1995 (Qld); Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care 1995 (SA); Human Tissue Act 1983 (Tas); Guidelines for Newborn Screening (Nov 2001) (Vic).
11.
For example, Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW); Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW); Health Records Act 2001 (Vic); Information Privacy Act 2000 (Vic); Health Records (Privacy and Access) Act 1997 (ACT); Health Services Act 1991 (Qld); South Australian Health Commission Act Amendment Act 1987 (SA).
12.
SzokeHelen. ‘Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology: The State of Play in Australia’ in FreckeltonIanPetersenKerry (eds), Controversies in Health Law (1999) 244.
13.
Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW) and Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulations 2009 (NSW); Infertility Treatment Act 1995 (Vic) as amended by the recent Health Legislation (Infertility Treatment and Medical Treatment) Act 2006 (Vic); Reproductive Technology (Clinical Practices) Act 1988 (SA); Human Reproductive Technology Act 1991 (WA).
14.
YZ v Infertility Treatment Authority [2005] VCAT 2655, [68].
15.
Secretary of the Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (1992) 175 CLR 218.
16.
MeagherSimon, ‘Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis: Recent Advances’ (Paper presented at the Scientific, Medical, Ethical and Legal Aspects in Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis Conference, Melbourne, 17 August 1999) 14.
17.
FordNorman (ed), Scientific, Medical Ethical and Legal Aspects of Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis (1999) 35.
18.
MichieSusanSmithDeanaMarteauTheresa M, ‘Prenatal Tests: How are Women Deciding?’ (1999) 19Prenatal Diagnosis743.
19.
NagleCate, ‘Evaluation of a Decision Aid for Prenatal Testing of Fetal Abnormalities: A Cluster Randomised Trial’ (2006) 6BMC Public Health96.
20.
WebleyCaroleHallidayJane, Report on Prenatal Diagnostic Testing in Victoria 1999 (1999) Perinatal Data Collection Unit 1. [In Australia] there may be covert and overt pressures to abort an abnormal foetus, as well as implicit societal and governmental support for this practice. This results in most women undergoing prenatal testing and the majority of abnormal foetuses being aborted.
21.
ShilohShoshana, ‘Decision-making in the context of genetic risk’ in MarteauTheresaRichardsMartin (eds), The Troubled Helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (1996); MichieSusan, ‘Nondirectiveness in Genetic Counselling: An Empirical Study’ (1997) 60(1) American journal of Human Genetics40.
22.
KolkerAlizaBurkeMeredith B, Prenatal Testing: A Sociological Perspective (1994) 43.
23.
HumeJoan, ‘Disability, Feminism and Eugenics: Who has the right to decide who should or should not inhabit the world?’ (Paper presented at the Women's Electoral Lobby National Conference, University of Technology, Sydney, 26 January 1996) 2.
24.
SigleyGary, Governing Chinese Bodies: Population, Reproduction and the Civilising Process in Contemporary China (PhD Thesis, Griffith University, 1996) 101.
25.
SavulescuJulian, ‘Deaf Lesbians, “Designer Disability,” and the Future of Medicine’ (2002) 325British Medical Journal771.