Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 21A(2)(h).
5.
Sentencing Act 2002 (NT) s9(1)(h).
6.
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 21A(2)(h).
7.
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 21A(5).
8.
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) ss 20D, 38T, 49ZTA, 49ZXC; Racial Vilification Act 1996 (SA) s 4; Discrimination Act 1991 (ACT) s 67; Anti-Discrimination Act1991 (Qld) s 131A; Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 (Vic) ss 24, 25.
9.
Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) s 20D.
10.
Western Australia Assembly Hansard, Criminal Law and Evidence Amendment Bill 2006, Hansard, Second Reading Speech, JohnsonRF (28 September 2006) p 6939 where Police v A Child (unreported, Magistrate Auty, 14 September 2006).
11.
R v MAH [2005] NSWSC 871; R v Amir Ibrahim El Mostafa [2007] NSWDC 219; R v Aslett [2006] NSWCCA 49. For further discussion see MasonGail, ‘Hate Crime Laws in Australia: Are they achieving their goals?’ (2009) 33 CrimLJ 1.
12.
Dunn v R [2007] NSWCCA 312.
13.
Ibid [12].
14.
Ibid [15].
15.
Ibid [18].
16.
Ibid [17].
17.
Ibid [29].
18.
Ibid [31].
19.
Ibid [32].
20.
JennessValerieGrattetRyken, Making Hate a Crime: From Social Movement to Law Enforcement (2001) 18.
21.
JennessValerieBroadKendal, Hate Crimes: New Social Movements and the Politics of Violence (1997) 106.
22.
LawrenceFrederick, Punishing Hate: Bias Crimes under American Law (1999) 63.
23.
JacobsJames BPotterKimberley, Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics (1998) 66, 144.
24.
JennessGrattet, above n 20, 179.
25.
BrownCharlotte, ‘Legislating Against Hate Crime in New Zealand: The Need to Recognise Gender-Based Violence’ (2004) 35Victoria University of Wellington Law Review591, 595. See also WaltersMark, ‘Hate Crimes in Australia: Introducing Punishment Enhancers’ (2005) 29Criminal Law Journal201, 206.
26.
Lawrence, above n 22, 13.
27.
New South Wales, Parliamentary Debates, Legislative Assembly, 19 November 2002, 6954, (Helen Sham-Ho, MLC).
28.
AllportGordon, The Nature of Prejudice (1954) 22–24. See also Young-BruehlElizabeth, The Anatomies of Prejudices (1996).
29.
JennessGrattet, above n 20, 54–62. Although the possibility that term sexual orientation could be misinterpreted to include ‘child molestation’ has led to the use of alternative phrases, such as ‘homosexuality and heterosexuality’ in some US legislation: ibid, 60.
30.
Government of Tasmania (Office of the Anti-discrimination Commissioner), Sexual Orientation and Lawful Sexual Activity: Discrimination (available at <antidiscrimination.tas.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/108831/adc_sexualorientation.pdf> at 28 October 2009. The Anti-discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) gives no guidance here as the relevant ground is narrowly defined as ‘homosexuality’: S 49ZG.
31.
Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (Vic) s 6(l); Government of Victoria (Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission), Sexual Orientation and Lawful Sexual Activity (2004) <humanrightscommission.vic.gov.au/types%20of%20discrimination/sexual%20orientation/default.asp>, at 28 October 2009. Ironically, the use of the phrase ‘lawful sexual activity’ may not provide such a safeguard if the legislation also covers ‘sexual orientation’ or ‘sexuality’ and these terms were to be interpreted to include paedophilia. See, for example: Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (Vic) s 6(d); Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld), ss 7(1),(n).
32.
BronittSimonStelliosJames, ‘Sedition, Security and Human Rights: “Unbalanced” Law Reform in the “War on Terror”’ (2007) 30Melbourne University Law Review923 at 948.