Dignity,Fairness and Good Government

English Law – The New Dimension (1974), 10–21.

109 LQR (1993) 390–400; and see Bingham Thomas , The Business of Judging (OUP, 2000), 131–140.

See Simpson Brian AW , Human Rights and End of Empire (2001), chs 18 and 19.

Ibid 930.

Ibid 946.

Eg, McCann v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 97.

Eg, Ireland v United Kingdom (1978) 2 EHRR 25; Tyrer v United Kingdom (1978) 2 EHRR 1.

Eg, Ashingdane v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 528.

Eg, Golder v United Kingdom (1975) 1 EHRR 524; Saunders v United Kingdom (1996) 23 EHRR 313.

Eg, McGinley and Egan v United Kingdom (1998) 27 EHRR 1; Dudgeon v United Kingdom (1981) 4 EHRR 149; Malone v United Kingdom (1984) 7 EHRR 14.

Eg, Tolstoy-Miloslavsky v United Kingdom (1995) 20 EHRR 442; The Observer and The Guardian v United Kingdom (1991) 14 EHRR 229.

Eg, Young, James and Webster v United Kingdom (1981) 4 EHRR 38.

Eg, Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v United Kingdom (1985) 7 EHRR 471.

R v Secretary of State for the Home department, Ex p Brind [1991] 1 AC 696.

Garland v British Rail Engineering Ltd [1983] 2 AC 751, 771.

[1995] 2 AC 633.

Z v United Kingdom (2001) 34 EHRR 97, para 40.

Para 74.

Para 74–75.

See D v East Berkshire Community Health NHS Trust [2005] UKHL 23; [2005] 2 AC 373, para 22.

‘Rights Brought Home: The Human Rights Bill’

Ibid, ch 2, paras 27–28.

Section 2(1).

Eg, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd [1993] AC 534, 551F; McCartan Turkington Breen (A Firm) v Times Newspapers Ltd [2001] 2 AC 277, 299D; A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2) [2005] UKHL 71; [2006] 2 AC 221, para 52.

White Paper, above, para 1.16.

‘Britain's Liberties: The Great Debate’, The Observer (London), 23 April 2006.

R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Exp Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326, 366A, 373F; R v A (No. 2) [2001] UKHL 25, [2002] 1 AC 45, para 44; Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30, [2004] 2 AC 557, para 30.

Adelaide Company of Jehovah's Witnesses Inc v The Commonwealth (1943) 67 CLR 116, 124.

Bingham Thomas , The Rule of Law’ (2007) 66 Cambridge Law Journal 67, 79.

Handyside v United Kingdom (1979) 1 EHRR 737, para 49.

Dudgeon v United Kingdom (1982) 4 EHRR 149, para 60.

Goodwin v United Kngdom (2002) 35 EHRR 18.

The Observer (London), 9 March 2008, 33.

Garton-Ash Timothy , ‘The Threat from Terrorism does not Justify Slicing Away our Freedoms’, The Guardian (London), 15 November 2007, 33.

Eg, Chahal v United Kingdom (1996) 35 EHRR 413.

Sporrong and Lonnroth v Sweden (1982) 5 EHRR 35, para 69.

R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27, [2004] 2 AC 368; Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11, [2007] 2 AC 167.

Such as McCann v United Kingdom (1995) 21 EHRR 97.

Such as A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 1502, [2004] QB 335

R (Amin) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] UKHL 51; [2004] 1 AC 653.

Napier v Scottish Ministers 2005 1 SC 229.

A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56; [2005] 2 AC 68.

Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ [2007] UKHL 45, [2008] 1 AC 385.

Starrs and Chalmers v Procurator Fiscal, Linlithgow, Appeal Court, High Court of Justiciary, Appeal No 1821/99.

EM (Lebanon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AF (A Child) and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 64; [2008] 3 WLR 931.

R (Laporte) v Chief Constable of Gloucestershire Constabulary [2006] UKHL 55; [2007] 2 AC 105.

R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Nos 1 and 2) (Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants intervening) [2008] UKHL 53; [2008] 3 WLR 549.