Commonwealth v Yarmirr (2001) 208CLR1, 115 (KirbyJ).
3.
See views canvassed in BrennanSeanGunnBrenda and WilliamsGeorge, ‘“Sovereignty” and its Relevance to Treaty-Making Between Indigenous Peoples and Australian Governments’ (2004) 26Sydney Law Review307.
4.
MorrisChristine, ‘Constitutional Dreaming’ in SampfordCharles and RoundTom (eds), Beyond the Republic: Meeting the Global Challenges of Constitutionalism (2001).
5.
WatsonIrene, ‘Indigenous Peoples' Law Ways: Survival Against the Colonial State’ (1997) 8Australian Feminist Law Journal39.
6.
BorrowsJohn, ‘With or Without You: First Nations Law (in Canada)’ (1996) 41McGill Law Journal629; ‘Creating an Indigenous Legal Community’ (2005) 50McGill Law Journal153.
7.
See generally BrierleyJohn and MacdonaldRoderick, Quebec Civil Law: An Introduction to Quebec Private Law (1993), 5–97, 121–125.
8.
See MacdonaldRoderick and MacLeanJason, ‘No Toilets in Park’ (2005) 50McGill Law Journal721, 731–735.
9.
JukierRosalie, ‘Where Law and Pedagogy Meet in the Transsystemic Contracts Classroom’ (2005) 50McGill Law Journal789.
10.
HendersonJames (Sakej), ‘Comprehending First Nations Jurisprudence’ (Paper presented at indigenous Law and Legal Systems: Recognition and Revitalisation, University of Toronto, Faculty of Law, 26–27 January 2007), webcast available at <indigenouslawjournal.org/?q=webcast> at 27 August 2008.
11.
Borrows, above n 6, 653.
12.
See R v Marshall; R v Bernard, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 220, 2005 SCC 43.
13.
See LawrenceBonita, ‘Gender, Race and the Regulation of Native Identity in Canada and the United States: An Overview’ (2003) 18Hypatia3.
14.
See AnkerKirsten, ‘The Truth in Painting: Cultural Artefacts as Proof of Native Title’ (2005) 9Law/Text/Culture91 for an elaboration of this analysis.
