WilliamsDaryl, ‘Who Speaks for the Courts?’ in Courts in a Representative Democracy, Collection of papers from the AIJA National Conference (1995), 192.
2.
Sue v Hill [1999] 199CLR462, 497, 499 for the High Court's discussion of the various meanings that might be ascribed to the expression ‘the Crown’ in constitutional theory.
3.
See Electoral and Administrative Review Commission, Report on Review of Independence of the Attorney-General (1993) para 3.21
4.
See for example HamerDavid, Can Responsible Government Survive in Australia?, Centre for Research in Public Sector Management (1994), 73; HawkeRobert, The Resolution of Conflict, Boyer Lectures, Australian Broadcasting Commission (1979), 23–4; SpryMax, ‘Executive and High Court Appointments’ in LindellGeoffrey and BennettRobert (eds), Parliament: The Vision in Hindsight (2001) 419, 419; GriffithSamuelSir, Convention Debates, Sydney, 4 March 1891, 36; WiseBernhardConvention Debates, Melbourne, 10 March 1898, 2198–9; DeakinAlfred, Convention Debates, Adelaide, 30 March 1897, 288; PlayfordThomas, Convention Debates, Sydney, 5 March 1891, 60 and IsaacsIsaacConvention Debates, Adelaide, 26 March 1897, 169. See generally Spry, 423–424
5.
HancockKeith, The Battle of Black Mountain. An Episode of Canberra's Environmental History (1974), 54
6.
WilliamsDaryl, ‘The Australian Parliament and High Court: Determination of Constitutional Questions’ in SampfordCharles and PrestonKim (eds), Interpreting Constitutions: Theories, Principles and Institutions (1996) 203, at 216–217
