HeydonGeorgina, The Language of Police Interviewing: A critical analysis (2005).
2.
DrewPaulHeritageJohn (eds), Talk at Work (1992); this edited collection is a seminal text in applying CA to institutional settings.
3.
The rules of turn-taking were first identified in SacksHarveySchegloffEmanuelJeffersonGail, ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-taking for Conversation’ (1974) 50(4) Language696.
4.
The Standing Orders were superseded in the early 1990s by the Operating Procedures of the Victoria Police Manual, which present the same information in a more succinct format. However, the Standing Orders provide a more interpretative insight to the Crimes Act and in any case, were still current when the data analysed here were recorded. For further discussion of this issue, see Heydon, above n 1, 6.
5.
Victoria Police Standing Orders Section 8.8.
6.
BilmesJack, ‘The Concept of Preference in Conversation Analysis’ (1988) 17Language in Society161.
7.
Ibid162.
8.
AtkinsonJ. MaxwellDrewPaul, Order in Court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings (1979).
9.
Bilmes, above n 6, 167.
10.
Ibid.
11.
Ibid, 167–9.
12.
FrankelRichard, ‘Talking in interviews: A dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters’ in PsathasGeorge (ed), Interaction Competence (1990) 231.
13.
Detailed, or ‘narrow’, transcriptions, using symbols to illustrate as many linguistic features as possible, are an essential part of the CA approach to micro-level language analysis, as the variation in pitch, emphasis and timing can be critical to the interpretation of a speaker's turn. Symbols show features such as overlapping speech, “latching – when the next utterance starts immediately after the previous turn, and pauses measured in seconds and fractions of second. Transcription conventions have, however, been removed from these extracts but are available from the author.
14.
Bilmes, above n 6, 167.
15.
Ibid.
16.
See for instance HamerDavid, ‘Does Silence Imply Guilt?’ (2006) 72 (Jan–Feb) Precedent 4; BiberKatherine, ‘On Not Speaking: The right to silence, the gagged trial judge and the spectre of child sexual abuse’ (2005) 30(1) Alternative Law Journal19.