StoreyDonovan (2003) ‘The peri-urban Pacific: From exclusive to inclusive cities’Asia Pacific Viewpoint44(3) 259–279
3.
Constitution of Solomon Islands, s.110.
4.
SchefflerHLarmourP, ‘Solomon Islands: Evolving a New Custom’ in CrocombeR, (ed) Land Tenure in the Pacific (1987) 303, 317.
5.
Land is regulated by ‘current customary usage’: Land and Titles Act [Cap 113], s.239. This is defined as the practice of Solomon Islanders relating to the matter in question, at the time when that question arises, regardless of whether that usage has existed from time immemorial or for any lesser period: Land and Titles Act [Cap 113], s.2.
PatersonD, ‘Conflicts arising from management and use of customary land’ (paper presented at FAO/USP/RICS Foundation South Pacific Land Tenure Conflict Symposium, 10–12 April 2002); KabutaulakaT T, ‘Beyond Ethnicity: The Political Economy of the Guadalcanal Crisis in Solomon Islands’State, Society and Governance in Melanesia Project, Working Paper 01/1 (2001) <http://rspas.anu.edu.au/papers/melanesia/working_papers/tarcisiusworkingpaper.html> at 19 May 2007
8.
FraenkelJon, The Manipulation of Custom. From Uprising to Intervention in the Solomon Islands (2004) 58
9.
[2001] SBHC 81 HC_CC (Constitutional) 195 of 2000 (9 November 2001)
10.
Constitution of Vanuatu1980, Arts 73, 74.
11.
Constitution of Vanuatu1980, Arts 75.
12.
Asian Development Bank, ‘Vanuatu’Business Information Guide to the Pacific Islands (2001) 153.
13.
Land Reform Act [Cap 123] s 7; Land Leases Act [Cap 163], ss 22 and 35; Urban Lands Act 1993, s 5.
14.
Storey, above n 2
15.
AruD., ‘Port Vila’ in Van TreaseH. (ed) Melanesian Politics: Stael Blong Vanuatu (1995), 357–36.
