Criminal Code ss 80.2 and 102.3 (in Schedule to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth)); Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act1979 (Cth) s 34ZS.
3.
WaltersBrian, Slapping on the Writs: Defamation, Developers and Community Activism (2003).
4.
Human Rights Committee, above n 1.
5.
On the topic of freedom of speech in pedestrian malls, see GelberKatharine, ‘Pedestrian Malls, Local Government and Free Speech Policy in Australia’ (2003) 22(2) Policy and Society: Journal of Public, Foreign and Global Policy22–49.
6.
ChestermanMichael, Freedom of Speech in Australian Law: A Delicate Plant (2000).
7.
Human Rights Committee, Communication No 1157/2003, paras 2.1 to 2.3, Coleman v Sellars (2000) 158 FLR 269, 270. Coleman has had many similar charges and court hearings for breaching Townsville by-laws and for resisting arrest in relation to those charges. I wrote about one such hearing in the Townsville Magistrates' Court in March 2000: See ChestermanJohn, ‘Mr Coleman is Not Entitled to be an Agitator’ (2000) 25(4) Alternative Law Journal191–2.
8.
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189CLR520, 560–2. See also Coleman v Sellars (2000) 158FLR271.
9.
Levy v Victoria [1997] HCA 31. On the nature and extent of the implied freedom, see further: StoneAdrienne, ‘Lange, Levy and the Direction of the Freedom of Political Communication under the Australian Constitution’ (1998) 21UNSW Law Journal117–34; Stone, ‘Rights, Personal Rights and Freedoms: The Nature of the Freedom of Political Communication’ (2001) 25Melbourne University Law Review374–417.
10.
For a case note about the appeal, see ChestermanJohn, ‘Sellars v Coleman: The Limits of Free Speech’ (2001) 36Australian Journal of Political Science373–5.
11.
Coleman v Sellars (2000) 158FLR269, at 273, 277, 282; Sellars v Coleman [2001] 2 Qd R 565. See also Chesterman, above n 10.
Transcript of Proceedings, Coleman v Sellars & Anor, above n 12, ‘Appellant's Summary of Argument’, 5–6.
14.
Transcript of Proceedings, above n 12.
15.
In 2004 Coleman did have a victory in the High Court on a different matter. He had been found guilty of using ‘threatening, abusive, or insulting words’ in publicly labelling a policeman ‘a corrupt police officer’. But the High Court overturned that conviction on the basis that the use of the word ‘corrupt’ was not ‘insulting’ under the then existing vagrancy legislation in Queensland. See Coleman v Power [2004] HCA 39. For my note on this case see ChestermanJohn, ‘What ‘Right’ to Free Speech?’ (2004) 29Alternative Law Journal255.
16.
Human Rights Committee, above n 1, para 7.3.
17.
Ibid, paras 4.1, 6.2.
18.
Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) s 16; Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act2006 (Vic) s 15.
19.
See, eg, DebeljakJulie, ‘Rights Protection Without Judicial Supremacy: A Review of the Canadian and British Models of Bills of Rights’ (2002) 26Melbourne University Law Review285–324; Debeljak, ‘The Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT): A Significant, Yet Incomplete, Step Toward the Domestic Protection and Promotion of Human Rights’ (2004) 15Public Law Review169–76.
20.
Human Rights Committee, above n 1, para 7.3, appendix.
21.
Human Rights Committee, Communication No 488/1992 [Toonen], CCPR/C/50/D/488/1992, 4 April 1994, <http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/d22a00bcd1320c9c80256724005e60d5?Opendocument> at 10 February 2007. See GelberKatharine, ‘Treaties and Intergovernmental Relations in Australia: Political Implications of the Toonen Case’ (1999) 45Australian Journal of Politics and History330–46, esp 333.
22.
See also Gelber, above n 21; EvattElizabeth, ‘Reflecting on the Role of International Communications in Implementing Human Rights’ (1999) 5(2) Australian Journal of Human Rights20; MorganWayne, ‘Passive/aggressive: The Australian Government's Responses to Optional Protocol Communications’ (1999) Australian Journal of Human Rights22.
Williams, The Case for an Australian Bill of Rights (2004); FeenanDermot, ‘Religious Vilification Laws: Quelling Fires of Hatred?’ (2006) 31(3) Alternative Law Journal153; Walters, above n 3.
28.
I met Patrick Coleman when I lived in Townsville, and I put him in touch with the QC who represented him in 2002 in his application for special leave to appeal to the High Court. I also offered some preliminary advice to Coleman about his application to the Human Rights Committee after special leave to appeal to the High Court was refused.