Herald and Weekly Times Pty Ltd v Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal & Ors [2006] VSCA 7 (9 February 2006) 41(Maxwell P) (‘Court of Appeal decision’).
2.
The Herald and Weekly Times Pty Ltd v Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal [2005] 11 VR 431 (1 June 2005) (‘the Supreme Court of Victoria decision’).
3.
Ibid [11].
4.
Ibid [67].
5.
Ibid.
6.
Ibid [52].
7.
Court of Appeal decision, above n 1, [30]
8.
Ibid [41].
9.
Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550, 584 (MasonJ).
10.
(1977) 137 CLR 487.
11.
Ibid508 (AickinJ).
12.
Ibid491 (BarwickCJ).
13.
Smith v Harris [1996] 2 VR 335; New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Contempt by Publication, Report 100 (2003), [11.3].
14.
Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules2005, O 28.05(1).
15.
Family Law Rules2004, rr 15.30, 15.31 and 15.32.
16.
New South Wales Supreme Court Practice Note 97.
17.
Ibid [3]
18.
[2001] NSWSC 568.
19.
Ibid [8].
20.
[2001] NSWSC 644.
21.
Ibid [2].
22.
Ibid [3].
23.
[2001] NSWSC 777.
24.
Ibid [9].
25.
Ibid [10] (SantowJ).
26.
[2001] NSWSC 496.
27.
Ibid [20]
28.
John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Police Tribunal (NSW) (1986) 5 NSWLR 465, 476–7.
29.
ASIC v Rich, above n 26, [22].
30.
[2000] NSWSC 929.
31.
Ibid [36].
32.
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, above n 13, [11.71].
33.
Ibid [11.63].
34.
SpigelmanJ J, ‘Seen to be Done: The Principle of Open Justice — Part 1’ (2000) 74ALJ290, 292.
35.
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, above n 14, [11.64].
36.
ASIC v Rich, above n 26, [23].
37.
Mangan v Melbourne Cricket Club [2006] VCAT 73 (8 February 2006).
38.
Robyn Beasley on behalf of Dylan Beasley v State of Victoria — Department of Education and Training [2006] VCAT 187 (17 February 2006).
