MarrDavidWilkinsonMarian, Dark Victory (2003) 155.
3.
Statement by the Judicial Conference of Australia (signed by the ShellerSimon Honourable Justice (Chairman), ‘The Honourable Justice Michael Kirby AC CMG’ (April 2002) <http://www.jca.asn.au/docs/kirby.html> 26 July 2006.
4.
WilliamsDaryl, The Courts and the Media: What Reforms are Needed and Why' (1999) 7University of Technology Sydney Law Review25. See also WilliamsDaryl, ‘Judicial Independence and the High Court’ (1998) 27University of Western Australia Law Review140.
Quoted in BrennanSJAO Frank, ‘The Limits of Judicial Review in Migration Decisions: An International Perspective’ (Paper presented at the Migration Institute of Australia Limited Victoria State Conference, Melbourne, 12 November 2003) <http://www.uniya.org/pdf/brennan_12nov03.pdf> at 26 July 2006, 5.
8.
Ibid6, quoting ‘Text of Statement made by Chief Justice Black of The Federal Court of Australia’, NAAV of 2001 v MIMIA (N265 of 2002), NABE of 2001 v MIMIA (N282 of 2002), Ratumaiwai v MIMIA (N399 of 2002), Turcan v MIMIA (V225 of 2002), MIMIA v Wang (S84 of 2002), 3 June 2002.
9.
‘Court contest is far from settled’, The Age (Melbourne), 6 June 2002, 6.
10.
Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372.
11.
MarrDavid, The Law according to Poor Daryl, QC', Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 19 January 2002.
12.
HamiltonClive, ‘What's Left? The Death of Social Democracy’ (2006) 21Quarterly Essay1.
13.
EppCharles R, The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (1998).
14.
BudlenderGeoff, ‘Public Interest Law: The South African Experience’ (Paper presented to the FLAC Conference, Public Interest Law in Ireland — the Reality and the Potential, Dublin, 6 October 2005) <http://www.flac.ie/news/GBudlender_FLAC_061005> at 26 July 2006.
