The SDA proscribes sex discrimination against an employee ‘in the terms or conditions of employment’ or ‘by subjecting the employee to any other detriment’ (s 14).
3.
Zhang, above n 1, [50].
4.
Ibid [59].
5.
Ibid [60].
6.
See, for example, Aldridge v Booth (1988) 80 ALR 1, Hall v Sheiban (1989) 20 FCR 217, 277 (French J); Elliott v Nanda (2001) 111 FCR 240.
7.
Shaw v Perpetual Trustees Tasmania Ltd (1993) EOC 92–550, cited with approval in Cooke v Plauen Holdings [2001] FMCA 91, [33].
8.
[2004] FMCA 62.
9.
Ibid [151].
10.
[2005] FMCA 111, [61].
11.
Ibid [27].
12.
See, eg, MacKinnonCatharine, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (1989): ‘All women live in sexual objectification the way fish live in water’ (149).
13.
Lloyd-JonesSusanne, You Can't Sell a Beer Without a Broad: The Political Economy of Sexuality in the Hotel Industry (B Ec (Social Sciences) Hons Thesis, University of Sydney, 1993) cited in KirkbyDianne, Barmaids: A History of Women's Work in Pubs (1997).
14.
Kirkby, above n 12, 206; see also GrimesSandra, ‘Across the Bar: Women's Work in Hotels’ in MandersonLenore (ed), Australian Ways: Anthropological Studies of an Industrialised Society (1985).
15.
Grimes, above n 14, 73.
16.
GuestKristine, quoted by WebbHelena, ‘Skimpy barmaids should cover up’, ABC Radio, Western Australia, 10 March 2005: <http://www.abc.net.au/wa/stories/s1320736.htm> at 21 June 2005.
