See Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 33, amended by US Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act 2004 (Cth) No 120, with effect from 1 January 2005.
2.
Longman v Winchester (1809) 16 Ves. Jun. 269, 33 ER 987, 987.
3.
University of London Press Ltd v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 601.
4.
Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539.
5.
Cox v Land and Water Journal Co (1869) LR 9 Eq 324 (about a ‘list of hounds’ recording the elaborate details of hunting days).
6.
Morris v Wright (1870) LR 5 Ch App 279 at 286 per Giffard LJ.
7.
(1991) 20 IPR 129; 499 US 340.
8.
[2002] FCAFC 112; (2002) 119 FCR 491.
9.
[2004] FCA 637.
10.
The Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 170LK allows employers to make collective enterprise agreements directly with staff, without any union being involved as a party to the agreement (although individual employees are entitled to appoint a union as a bargaining agent in the making of such an agreement). Not surprisingly, the union movement has generally resisted the use of s 170LK agreements, because they dispense with a negotiating role for unions.
11.
For a note on the privacy implications of the decision, see WitzlebNormann, ‘Federal Court Strengthens Privacy Enforcement: Seven Network (Operations) Limited v Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance [2004] FCA 637’ (2005) 33Australian Business Law Review45.
12.
[2004] FCA 637, [27].
13.
Witzleb, above n 11, also criticises the decision for interpreting the National Privacy Principles in the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) too restrictively.
