Joint Select Committee on Certain Family Law Issues, The Operation and Effectiveness of the Child Support Schemes (1994).
2.
See the Terms of Reference to the Report of the Family Law Pathways Advisory Group, Out of the Maze: Pathways to the Future for Families Experiencing Separation (July 2001).
3.
Ibid.
4.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Community Affairs, Every Picture Tells a Story: Report on the Inquiry into Child Custody Arrangements in the Event of Family Separation (2003) xvii <www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/fca/childcustody/report.htm> at 2 February 2005.
See The Hon Larry Anthony MP, ‘Taskforce to Examine Child Support Scheme’ (Media Release, 16 August 2004) <www.csa.gov.au/release2.pdf> at 2 February 2005.
9.
The Every Picture Report, above n 4, paras 6.163–6.174.
10.
The Every Picture Report, above n 4, paras 6.175–6.181
11.
The Every Picture Report, above n 4, para 6.191.
12.
The most frequent comment made to the 1994 Joint Select Committee related to the formula being unfairly harsh (see above n 1, para 4.43).
13.
GraycarR, ‘Law Reform by Frozen Chook: Family Law Reform for the New Millennium’ (2000) Melbourne University Law Review737, 750.
14.
RhoadesHBoydS, ‘Reforming Custody Laws: A Comparative Study’ (2004) 2(18) International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family119, 119–120.
15.
SmythBWestonR, ‘Financial Living Standards after Divorce: A Recent Snapshot’, (Research Paper No 23, AIFS, 2000) 19.