One recent attempt to understand jury reasoning is ChestermanMChanJHamptonS, Managing Prejudicial Publicity: An empirical study of criminal jury trials in New South Wales (2001).
39.
Notwithstanding appeals on the basis of verdicts that are ‘unreasonable’, for which M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 and R v Gordon and Gordon (1991) 57 A Crim R 413 are authorities permitting appellate courts, in limited circumstances, to overturn a jury's verdict in criminal matters.
40.
Davis v The Queen S39/2000 (3 May 2001) (with which Azzopardi was joined). R v OGD (1997) 45 NSWLR 744, the leading NSW authority and a child sexual assault, was the source of this principle.
41.
RPS v The Queen (2000) 199 CLR 620, Dyers v The Queen (2002) 210 CLR 285.
42.
Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427.
43.
Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79, Doggett v The Queen (2001) 208 CLR
44.
Crampton v The Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161 and R v BWT (2002) 54 NSWLR 241.
45.
R v RJC (Unreported, NSW CCA, 3 April 1998).
46.
TKWJ v The Queen (2002) 212 CLR 124.
47.
BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275.
48.
Hoch v The Queen (1998) 165 CLR 292 and Pfennig v The Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461.