National Pro Bono Task Force, Report of the National Pro Bono Task Force, (Australian Law Reform Commission2001) 8–9.
2.
Ibid29–30.
3.
Ibid30–31.
4.
Australian Law Reform Commission, Managing Justice (ALRC 89) para 2.13.
5.
HallDavid, ‘The Law School's Role in Cultivating a Commitment to Pro Bono’ (1998) 42(3) Boston Bar Journal4, 4.
6.
StoneAdrienne, ‘The Public Interest and the Power of the Feminist Critique of Law School: Women's Empowerment of Legal Education and its Implications for the Fate of Public Interest Commitment’ (1997) 5American University Journal of Gender and the Law525.
7.
Task Force above n 1, 31.
8.
Ibid4–7.
9.
For a description of the available clinical legal programs in Australian law schools see the National Pro Bono Resource Centre, Pro Bono and Clinical Legal Education Programs in Australian Law Schools, Information paper, August 2004 available from the NPBRC web site <www.nationalprobono.org.au> at 20 November 2004.
10.
Ibid9.
11.
Ibid.
12.
Ibid10.
13.
Griffith Law School, Clinical Legal Education Programs Strategic Plan 2003–2007 quoted in NPBRC information paper in n 9, 10.
14.
JohnstoneRVignaendraS, Learning Outcomes and Curriculum Development in Law (Australian University Teaching Committee2003) 453.
15.
Ibid454.
16.
ALRC above n 4, para 2.82.
17.
Ibid.
18.
Hall above n 5, 20.
19.
BailleJamesBernstein-BakerJudith, ‘In the Spirit of Public Service: Model Rule 6.1, the Profession and Legal Education’ (1994) 13Law and Inequality51, 67.
20.
ParkerStephen‘Why Lawyers should do Pro Bono Work’ in ArupChristopherLasterKathy (eds), For the Public Good: Pro Bono and the Legal Profession in Australia (2001) 11.
21.
Ibid7.
22.
Stone above n 6, 533–5.
23.
ChaifetzJill, ‘The Value of Public Service: A Model for Instilling a Pro Bono Ethic in Law School’ (1992–1993) 45Stanford Law Review1695, 1697.
24.
BailleBernstein-Baker above n 19, 66.
25.
AdcockCynthiaKeeganAlison, A Handbook on Law School Pro Bono Programs, Association of American Law Schools (2001) 9.
