Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs and B and B (2003) FLC 93–142, 78,375.
4.
See GrattanMichelle, ‘Release the Children says Report’, The Age (Melbourne), 8 May 2004, News 7.
5.
B Federal Court [2004] FCA 699 Lander J (3 June 2004).
6.
Leave to intervene was granted on behalf of Mazhar in Singh v Commonwealth of Australia, Transcript of proceedings (High Court, GleesonCJ, 10 February 2004).
B High Court (2004) 206 ALR 130 para 177 (Kirby J).
18.
B Federal Court [2004] FCA 699 Lander J (3 June 2004), para 72.
19.
B Federal Court [2004] FCA 699 Lander J (3 June 2004), para 101 and 109.
20.
B Full Court (2003) FLC 93–141, 78,359
21.
B High Court (2004) 206 ALR 130 para 139 (Kirby J).
22.
For a detailed discussion of the Committee's conclusion see Tania Penovic, ‘Immigration Detention of Children: Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty’ (2003–2004) 7(2) Newcastle Law Review35.
23.
B High Court (2004) 206 ALR 130 para 153 (Kirby J).
24.
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs and B and B (2003) FLC 93–142, 78,347.
25.
State of Victoria v Commonwealth of Australia (1996) 187 CLR 416, 487.
See ChisholmRichard, ‘Immigration and the Family Court: The High Court Speaks’ (2004) 18Australian Journal of Family Law193, 206–07.
29.
Accrued jurisdiction permits the Family Court to determine claims which do not ordinarily fall within its jurisdiction (for example, common law claims) but which are seen as being part of the same ‘matter’ as a claim which does fall within its jurisdiction.