See the collection of work in FoxGregoryRothBrad (eds), Democratic Governance and International Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
2.
FranckThomas M., ‘The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance’, (1992) 86American Journal of International Law46 at 47 and 55.
3.
Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, Annex to GA Res. 2625, 25 UN GAOR Supp. (No.28) at 121, UN Doc. A/8028 (1970). The GA adopted this declaration on 10 December 1948, see GA Res. 217A, UN GAOR, 3rd sess. at p.71.
4.
UKTSc6 (1977), Cmnd. 6702; (1967) 61AJIL870. By March 1999 144 nation–states were parties to the Covenant. FoxGregory, ‘The Right to Political Participation in International Law’, in FoxRoth (eds), above, ref 1, p.53.
5.
This is Fukuyama's theory of the ‘end of history’, as discussed in detail by MarksSusan, ‘International Law, Democracy and the End of History’, in FoxRoth (eds), above, ref 1, pp.532–66.
6.
OjoB., Human Rights and the New World Order: Universality, Acceptability and Human Diversity, Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, 1997, p.87; FranckThomas, ‘Democracy as a Human Right’, in HenkinLewisHargroveJohn (eds), Human Rights An Agenda for the Next Century, The American Society of International Law, Washington, 1994, pp.73–102 at 73.
7.
RatnerStephen, ‘Democracy and Accountability: The Criss-Crossing of two Emerging Norms’, in HenkinLewisHargroveJohn (eds), above, ref 10, pp.449–90.
8.
DasguptaParthaMaskinEric, ‘Democracy and Other Goods’, in ShapiroIanHacker-GordonCasiano (eds), Democracy's Value, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp.69–91 and 81.
9.
OwenJohn, ‘International Law and the “Liberal Peace”’ in FoxRoth (eds) above, ref 1, pp. 343–85; FoxNolte, ‘Intolerant Democracies’ in RothFox anf (eds) above, ref1, pp. 389–435 at 397.
10.
See Franck, above ref 2 generally.
11.
For example see Articles 1(2) and 55 of the UN Charter; the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples GA Res. 1514 (XV); the Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, GA Res. 2625 (XXV); Article 1(1) ICCPR; the American Convention on Human Rights; the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
12.
This is in accordance with Article 53 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. See also Gros-EspiellH., The Right to Self-Determination of United Nations Resolutions, United Nations, 1980.
13.
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South-West Africa)ICJ Rep., 1971, p.16.
14.
Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion)ICJ Rep., 1975, p.23.
15.
TomuschatChristian, ‘Self-determination in a Post-Colonial World in Secession’ in TomuschatChristian (ed.), Modern Law of Self-Determination, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993, pp.1–20 at 2.
16.
Franck, above, ref 2, pp.46 and 52; CrawfordJames, ‘Democracy and the Body of International Law’, in FoxRoth (eds), above, ref1, p.94.
17.
United Communist Party of Turkey (TBKP) v Turkey, 26 European Human Rights Reports 121 (1998) 45, where the Court held that Turkey had violated Art.11 of the European Convention in banning the TBKP because of its desire for a peaceful solution to the Kurdish problem, and thus prevented the right to democracy.
18.
Franck, above, ref 2, p.49; TancaAntonio, Foreign Armed Intervention in Internal Conflict, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993, p.106.
19.
FranckThomas, above, ref 2, p.46.
20.
MurphySean, ‘Democratic Legitimacy and the Recognition of States and Governments’, (1999) 48(3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly545 at 547.
21.
FranckThomas, in FoxRoth (eds), above, ref 1, at p.46. Articles 1.2 and 1.3 of the ICCPR as well as resolutions of the UN General Assembly, paras 4 and 5 Res.1514 (XXV); Res. 2825(XV).
22.
G.A. Res.2787 (XXVI), 1971.
23.
Tanca, above, ref 16, pp.106–7.
24.
DuursmaJorri, Fragmentation and the International Relations of Micro-States, Self-Determination and Statehood, Cambridge University Press, 1996, p.11.
25.
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of America)1986 Rep., p.14 (the Nicaragua Case).
26.
QuaneHelen, ‘The United Nations and the Evolving Right to Self-Determination,’ (1998) 47(3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly537 at 548–558 and 555.
27.
‘The principle of self-determination as a right of peoples, and its application for the purpose of bringing all colonial situations to a speedy end’, Western Sahara (Advisory Opinion) Case, ICJ Rep., 1975, p.31 at para. 55, emphasis added.
28.
CasseseAntonio, Self-Determination of Peoples, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp.14–18.
29.
CasseseAntonio, above, ref 26, pp.46–47 and 52–54. See, in particular, the remark by the Chairman of the Working Party of the Third Committee at ref 51.
30.
SalmonJean, ‘Internal Aspects of the Right to Self-Determination’ in TomuschatC. (ed), above ref 13, p.268.
31.
BatistichM., ‘The Right to Self-Determination and International Law’, (1992–1995) 7Auckland University Law Review1013 at 1015.
32.
Wilson's Fourteen Points: See Cassese, above, ref 26, pp.22–24.
33.
RothsteinRobert, ‘Weak Democracy and the Prospect for Peace and Prosperity in the Third World’, in BrownS.SchraubK. (eds), Resolving Third World Conflict, Challenges for a New Era, United States Institute for Peace, Washington, 1992, pp.16–50 at 17.