I can cite no source for this and the three succeeding quotations, as I borrowed from many sources to write them myself, for pedagogical purposes, for a colloquium in 1997 with the ANU political science honours students enrolled in Professor John Warhurst's seminar course on ‘The Ten Best Books on Australian Politics’.
2.
These cognate and mutually illuminating concepts are usefully elaborated in BlackshieldTonyCoperMichaelWilliamsGeorge (eds), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia, Oxford University Press, 2001 (hereafter The Oxford Companion) by various authors: See, for example, GagelerStephen, ‘Legalism’ (pp.429–30); BlackshieldTony, ‘Realism’ (pp.582–5); BrennanGerard, ‘Values’ (pp.695–6); MasonAnthony, ‘Policy considerations’ (pp.535–6); MasonAnthony, ‘Law-making role: Reflections’ (pp.423–4); GibbsHarry, ‘Law-making role: Further reflections’ (pp.424–5); GleesonMurray, ‘Role of Court’ (pp.609–10); CoperMichael, ‘Political institution, Court as’ (pp.539–41).
3.
Gould v Brown (1998) 193CLR346, Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511.
4.
RoseDennis, ‘The Bizarre Destruction of Cross-Vesting’ in StoneAdrienneWilliamsGeorge (eds), The High Court at the Crossroads, The Federation Press, 2000, p.186.
5.
See especially the majority judgments in Re Wakim, above, ref 3.
6.
See the various contributions in CoperMichaelWilliamsGeorge (eds), How Many Cheers for Engineers?The Federation Press, 1997, especially BookerKevenGlassArthur, ‘What Makes the Engineers Case a Classic?’, pp.45–71.
7.
de Q WalkerGeoffrey, ‘The Seven Pillars of Centralism: Engineers Case and Federalism’, (2002) 76Australian Law Journal678.
8.
CoperMichael, ‘Section 92 of the Australian Constitution since Cole v Whitfield’ in LeeH.P.WintertonGeorge, Australian Constitutional Perspectives, Law Book Co Ltd, 1992, p.129.
9.
For Barwick's astonished reaction to Cole v Whitfield, see Bar News (NSW), Summer 1989, p.17.
10.
PileStephen, The Book of Heroic Failures, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979. See also PileStephen, The Return of Heroic Failures, Martin Secker & Warburg Ltd, 1988.
11.
VickersHugh, Great Operatic Disasters, Macmillan, 1979.
12.
See GrahamMorris, ‘Piddington, Albert Bathurst’ in The Oxford Companion, pp.533–5.
13.
CoveyStephen, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Families, Allen & Unwin, 1997. See also CoveyStephen, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Simon & Schuster, 1990.
14.
See Attorney-General (NSW); Ex rel McKellar v Commonwealth (1977) 139CLR525, 532.
15.
Piddington v Bennett and Wood Pty Ltd (1940) 63CLR533.
16.
R v Murphy (1985) 158CLR596.
17.
Smith Kline & French Laboratories (Aust) Ltd v Commonwealth, Carson v John Fairfax & Sons (1991) 173CLR194.
18.
HeydonDyson, ‘Judicial Activism and the Death of the Rule of Law’, (2003) Quadrant January-February, p.9. For the much anticipated reply, see MasonAnthony, ‘The Centenary of the High Court’, speech given at the UNSW 2003 Constitutional Law Conference Dinner, Parliament House, Sydney, 21 February 2003.
19.
The Oxford Companion, pp.130–3.
20.
Annual Report of the High Court of Australia 1998–1999, cited above, ref 19.
21.
SimpsonAmeliaSimpsonTroy, ‘Personal relations’, in The Oxford Companion, pp.528–31 at 531. See also MasonAnthony, ‘Personal relations: A personal reflection’, in The Oxford Companion, pp.531–3.
22.
Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193CLR72.
23.
Cited by BennettDavid, ‘Argument before the Court’, in The Oxford Companion, pp.31–32 at 31.
24.
CampbellEnid, ‘Reasons for Judgment: Some Consumer Perspectives’, (2003) 77Australian Law Journal62.
25.
See CoperMichael, ‘Joint judgments and separate judgments’, in The Oxford Companion, pp.367–9.
26.
The same point is made by JacksonDavidPriestJoan in ‘Gibbs, Harry Talbot’ in The Oxford Companion, pp.300–03 at 302.
27.
I am indebted to Tony Blackshield for drawing this delightful phrase to my attention: For the source, see BelseyCatherine, Critical Practice, Methuen, 1980, pp. 4–5, where the author asserts that the language used in postmodern critical theory must be obscure in order to avoid the tyranny of lucidity.
28.
GerardGertrude, ‘A Reply to the AAP Case’, (1977) 2University of New South Wales Law Journal105.
29.
Covey, above, ref 13, p.390.
30.
SchwartzBernard, A Book of Legal Lists: The Best and Worst in American Law, Oxford University Press, 1997. See also MerskyRoy MHartmanGary R., 'Rating the Justices, (1992) 84Law Library Journal113.
31.
The Oxford Companion, p.viii.
32.
The Oxford Companion, pp.8–11 (McMillanJohn).
33.
The Oxford Companion, pp.115–17 (FisherSimon).
34.
The Oxford Companion, pp.238–41 (JonesJudith).
35.
The Oxford Companion, pp.243–6 (ParkinsonPatrick).
36.
The Oxford Companion, pp.684–6 (ChalmersDonaldPontGino Dal).
37.
The Oxford Companion pp.254–6 (HeydonDyson).
38.
The Oxford Companion, pp.2–3 (TooheyJohn), pp.110–13 (DominelloFrancesca), pp.443–4 (BlackshieldTonyFrickeGrahamSimpsonAmelia), pp.446–8 (NettheimGarth), pp.576–9 (BrennanFrankDominelloFrancesca). However, for developments since these entries were written, see BrennanSean, ‘Ward, Wilson and Yorta Yorta: The High Court, Native Title and the Constitution a Decade after Mabo’, UNSW 2003 Constitutional Law Conference, Parliament House, Sydney, 21 February 2003.
39.
The Oxford Companion, pp.181–4 (FindlayMarkYeoStanley).
40.
The Oxford Companion, pp.256–8 (CoperMichael).
41.
The Oxford Companion, pp.388–1 (BrownDavid).
42.
The Oxford Companion, pp. 641–3 (PearceDennis).
43.
The Oxford Companion, pp.659–1 (KobetskyMichaelKreverRick).
44.
Evaluating the Engineers case particularly raises this issue: Cf WindeyerJ, in Victoria v Commonwealth (the Payroll Tax Case) (1971) 122CLR353, 395–397.
45.
See, for example, ColbranStephen, ‘Judicial Performance Evaluation: Accountability Without Compliance’, (2002) 76Australian Law Journal235 and the literature cited therein.
46.
Arguably, fairness is necessary rather than antithetical to efficiency, but that is another debate.
47.
See, for example, EvansSimon, ‘Appointment of Justices’ in The Oxford Companion, pp.19–23.
48.
Heydon, above, ref 18, p.10.
49.
Cf CoperMichael, Encounters with the Australian Constitution, CCH, 1987, p.419.
50.
SackvilleRonald, ‘Activism’ in The Oxford Companion, pp.6–7. See also Mason, above, ref 18.
51.
CoperMichael, ‘The Path of the Law’, (2002) 76Australian Law Journal716, 723.
52.
Cf BlackshieldTony, ‘Judicial Reasoning’ in The Oxford Companion, pp.373–6.
53.
I would not want it to be thought that I am assuming that this criterion should be dispositive in every case. Even if the history were not disputed (to which it is always vulnerable), many would nominate in the ‘failure’ category New South Wales v Commonwealth (the Incorporation Case) (1990) 169 CLR 482, precisely because of its fidelity to history. On the place of history, see Coper, above, ref 49, pp.408–18, and on consistency as a possible reconciliation, see CoperM., ‘Interpreting the Constitution: A Handbook for Judges and Commentators’ in BlackshieldTony (ed.), Essays in Honour of Julius Stone, Butterworths, 1983, pp.52–67.
54.
See further above, ref 8.
55.
BennettJ.M., ‘Establishment of Court’ in The Oxford Companion, pp.246–8; Keystone of the Federal Arch, AGPS, 1980.
56.
BlackshieldTonyCoperMichaelGoldringJohn, ‘Privy Council’ in The Oxford Companion, pp.560–2; Coper, above ref 49, pp.104–09.