ShandAdam, ‘Creditors Face $1.8 Billion Ansett Black Hole’, Australian Financial Review, 18 January 2002, pp.1, 7.
2.
The Benfield Greig Report commissioned by the NSW Department of Industrial Relations cites ‘a general paucity of data to support any detailed analysis’ of this problem. See National Insurance Scheme to Protect Employee Entitlements, Preliminary Feasibility Study, 29 July 1999.
3.
See Abbott, Media Release dated 20 September 2001, ‘Even Better Arrangements to Protect Employee Entitlements’, <www.dewrsb.gov.au/ministers>, last visited 3 October 2001.
4.
See the Airline Passenger Ticket Levy (Collection) Act 2001 and the Air Passenger Ticket Levy (Imposition) Act 2001, passed on 26 and 27 September 2001.
5.
For examples of this viewpoint, see HewsonJohn‘Howard's Ties Lead to Bind’, Australian Financial Review, 11 February 2000, p.15; KohlerAlan‘Family Ties Undo Fair Policy’, Australian Financial Review, 15 February 2000, p.20; Editorial, ‘Keep Politics out of Pay-Outs’, Australian Financial Review, 9 February 2000, p.16.
6.
For an interesting collection of views on the various causes of the major collapses of recent times, see CCH Australia Ltd, Collapse Incorporated: Tales, Safeguards & Responsibilities of Corporate Australia, 2001, CCH, Sydney.
7.
For an illuminating discussion on the development of the floating charge see NkalaJ.C., ‘Some Aspects of the Jurisprudence of the Floating Charge’, (1993) Companies and Securities Law Journal301–316.
8.
For a full discussion of the effect of the bargaining system in externalising employee interests see HillJennifer, ‘At the Frontiers of Labour Law and Corporate Law: Enterprise Bargaining, Corporation and Employees’, (1995) 23Federal Law Review204. It should be acknowledged, however, that Katherine Van Wezel Stone, in her work in this field, contests the assertion that collective bargaining is inherently adversarial. See ‘Labor and the Corporate Structure: Changing Conceptions and Emerging Possibilities’, (1988) 55University of Chicago Law Review73.
9.
For a discussion of the distinction between this dominant paradigm, and communitarian theories of corporate governance, see HillJennifer, ‘Public Beginnings, Private Ends — Should Corporate Law Privilege the Interests of Shareholders?’, (1998) 9Australian Journal of Corporate Law21.
10.
See, for instance, Hutton v West Cork Railway Co (1883) 23 ChD 654, and Parke v Daily News Ltd [1962] Ch 927.
11.
A full account of the details of the National Textiles and Steel Tank & Pipe arrangements is to be published in RileyJ., ‘Bargaining for Security: Lessons for Employees from the World of Corporate Finance’, [2002] Journal of Industrial Relations (forthcoming).
12.
For a discussion of HRM practices and the role of communication and information-sharing, see the article, and the references cited within: DeeryStephen and WalshJanet, ‘The Character of Individualised Employment Arrangements in Australia: A model of ‘Hard’ HRM’, in DeeryS. and MitchellR. (eds), Employment Relations: Individualisation and Union Exclusion an International Study, Federation Press, 1999.
13.
See for instance, the system long in operation in Germany: VorbruggGeorg‘Labor Participation in German Companies and Its European Context’, (1977) 11International Lawyer249–59. See also the proposals of McCallumRon, ‘Crafting a New Collective Labour Law for Australia’, (1997) 39Journal of Industrial Relations405–21.
14.
See for instance BrayMarkLe QueuxStephanePeterWaring and McDonaldDuncan, The Representation Gap in Australia: A Discussion Paper prepared for the Australian Services Union, Employment Studies Centre, University of Newcastle, March 2001.