See, for example, OttoDianne, ‘A Barren Future? Equity's Conscience and Women's Inequality’, (1992) 18MULR808 at pp.815–23; SinghSupriya, For Love Not Money: Women, Information and the Family Business, Consumer Advocacy and Financial Counselling Association of Victoria (Inc), Melbourne, 1995; BaronPaula, ‘The Free Exercise of Her Will: Women and Emotionally Transmitted Debt,’ (1995) 13Law in Context23–56; Good Relations, High Risks: Financial Transactions Within Families and Between Friends, Report of the Expert Group on Financial Vulnerability (Commonwealth), February 1996, esp pp.28, 39–41; FehlbergBelinda, Sexually Transmitted Debt: Surety Experience and English Law, Clarendon Press, 1997; FehlbergBelinda, ‘Money and Marriage: Sexually Transmitted Debt in England,’ (1997) 11International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family320–43; HowellNicola, ‘Sexually Transmitted Debt: Where Emotion Meets the Law,’ (1998) 2(3) Consumer Rights Journal <http://home.vicnet.net.au/∼fcrc/crj/2_3a.htm>; MahalinghamSue, ‘Deep and Meaningful: Dealing with Emotionally Transmitted Debt,’ (1999) 3(6) Consumer Rights Journal; BaileyMisty, ‘Sexually Transmitted Debt: Criticisms and Prospects for Reform,’ (1999) 8Auckland University LR1001–32.
2.
Garcia v National Australia Bank Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 395, per Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ at para 22, p.404.
Choi, Namkee G. and others, ‘Financial Exploitation of Elders: Analysis of Risk Factors Based on County Adult Protective Services Data,’ (1991) 10Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect39 at 55.
5.
FehlbergBelinda, Sexually Transmitted Debt, above, ref 1, pp.14–15. See also the Expert Group on Family Financial Vulnerability, Good Relations, High Risks, p.6 and HowellNicola, above, ref 1.
6.
See, however, Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021 at 1046, 1059, where the House of Lords effectively required lenders to inform a borrower's guarantor–wife of the borrower's financial circumstances.
7.
For a good critique of the majority judgment in Garcia, see HiiSu-King, ‘From Yerkey to Garcia: 60 Years on and Still as Confused as Ever!’ (1999) 7Australian Property LJ47–75.
8.
BaileyMisty, above, ref 1, ‘Sexually Transmitted Debt’ at p 1025.
9.
FehlbergBelinda, ‘Money and Marriage’, above, ref 1 at p.331. See also BaronPaula, above, ref 1, p.28.
10.
ThomsonAlan, ‘The Law of Contract’, in Grigg-SpallIan and IrelandPaddy (eds), The Critical Lawyers' Handbook, Pluto Press, London, 1992, p.71.
11.
See BigwoodRick, ‘Conscience and the Liberal Conception of Contract: Observing Basic Distinctions Part I,’ (2000) 16JCL1–36 at 1–8 (quotations from pp.1–2).
12.
See, for example, Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss.51AA, 51AB, 80 and 87, Consumer Credit Code, s.70, Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) ss.7 and 9 and equivalent State Acts. Likewise, doctrines such as undue influence, unconscionability, duress and mistake have been broadened judicially, particularly in cases involving relationship debt. See Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447, CIBC Mortgages v Pitt [1994] 1 AC 200, Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [2001] 3 WLR 1021.
13.
For an analysis of the problems of applying the traditional model of contract to sexually-transmitted debt, see BaileyMisty, above, ref 1, pp.1024–28.
14.
BigwoodRick, ‘Conscience’, above, ref. 11, at pp.10–11.
See ‘Guaranteeing Someone Else's Debts: Submission by the Centre for Elder Law, University of Western Sydney to the NSW Law Reform Commission,’ written and prepared by Juliet Cummins, 1999, <http://www.uws.edu.au/law/elderlaw/submission>.
19.
See TrebilcockMichael J and ElliottStephen, ‘The Scope and Limits of Legal Paternalism’ in BensonPeter (ed.) The Theory of Contract Law: New Essays, Cambridge University Press, 2001, p.51.
20.
See New South Wales Law Reform Commission Issues Paper 17, Guaranteeing Someone Else's Debts, Sydney, 2000.