HarawayDonna, Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMancp_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience, Routledge, New York, 1997, p.149.
2.
KnowlesRon, Lets gob swab the lot of them, Sydney Morning Herald, 12 April 2000. See too ‘Test them all: Beattie's plan for prisoner DNA blitz’, Sunday Mail, 14 April 2001, p.1.
3.
Refer generally to GansJ., ‘A Critique of the Police's Right to ask for DNA’The Use of DNA in the Criminal Justice System, Seminar presented by the Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney, 11 April 2001.
4.
See generally MeagherD., The Quiet Revolution — A Brief History of Analysis of the Growth of Forensic Police Powers in Victoria, (2000) Criminal Law Journal 76 particularly at p.84 onward.
5.
MeagherD., above, pp.76, 82.
6.
MobbsJ., ‘The National Criminal Investigation DNA Database — An Investigative Tool for the Future’, The Use of DNA in the Criminal Justice System, Seminar presented by the Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney, 11 April 2001.
7.
Model Criminal Code Officers Committee of the Standing Committee of Attorney's General, Model Forensic Procedures Bill and the Proposed DNA Database, May 1999, p.2.
8.
For example the re-examination of the case of Colin Ross who was hanged for murder in the early 1920s.
9.
Wilson-WildeL., ‘DNA Profiling and its Impacton Policing’, The Use of DNA in the Criminal Justice System, Seminar presented by the Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney, 11 April 2001. See too the overturning of the conviction in R v Button, [2001] QCA 133.
10.
Refer generally RobertsH., ‘Interpretation of DNA Evidence in Courts of Law: A Survey of Issues’, (1998) 30(1) Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences29.
11.
MoynihanR., DNA testing threatens freedoms: Kirby', Australian Financial Review, 14 April 2000, cited in HeaslerA., ‘An Overview of DNA Testing and the New Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000’, The Use of DNA in the Criminal Justice System, Seminar presented by the Institute of Criminology, University of Sydney, 11 April 2001, p.2. See too HockingB.McCallumH.SmithA. and ButlerC, ‘Human Rights and the Criminal Justice System’, (1997) 3Australian Journal of Human Rights.
12.
MeagherD., The Quiet Revolution — A Brief History and Analysis of the Growth of Police Powers in Victoria, (2000) 24Criminal Law Journal76 at 77.
13.
EastealP. and EastealS., ‘Report to the Australian Police Ministers Council- The Forensic Use of DNA Profiling in Australia: Need for a National database’, Australian Institute of Criminology, 1991.
YoungW.TinsleyY. and CameronN., The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Jury Decision Making, (2000) Criminal Law Journal89. See further HockingB., and others, above, ref 12.
19.
Table listing possible sources of DNA, Wilson-WildeL., above, ref 10, p.4.
20.
Wilson-WildeL., above, ref 10, p.3.
21.
Wilson-WildeL., above, ref 10, p.5.
22.
RedmayneM., ‘Doubts and Burdens: DNA Evidence, Probability and the Courts’, (1995) Criminal Law Review464.
23.
MeagherD., above, ref 5, pp.76, 78.
24.
Wilson-WildeL., above, ref 10, p.4.
25.
R v Borham (unreported 3/11/92 CCA NSW) as cited in HaeslerA., above, ref 12, p.28.
26.
For a general discussion of the pitfalls in the jury system see YoungW.TinsleyY. and CameronN., ‘The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Jury Decision Making’, (2000) Criminal Law Journal89.
27.
For example the Chamberlain case.
28.
FleisingUsher, ‘Genetic Essentialism, Mana, and the Meaning of DNA’ (2001) 20New Genetics and Society43.
29.
StarrCecie and TaggertRalph, Biology: The Unity and Diversity of Life, Wadsworth, Belmont, 5th edn, 1989, p.430.
30.
HarawayDonna, above, ref 1, p.146.
31.
FleisingUsher, above, ref 29, pp.45–6.
32.
HarawayDonna, above, ref 1, p.149.
33.
MurphyTim, ‘Britcrits: Subversion and Submission, Past, Present and Future’, (1999) 10Law and Critique237.
34.
MurphyTim, above.
35.
HoggRussell and BrownDavid, Rethinking Law and Order, Pluto Press, Annandale, 1998.
36.
An innocently, benefital sounding legislative phrase that legalised the removal of indigenous people. See Cubillo v Commonwealth of Australia (2000) 174ALR97.
37.
WilsonRonald, Bringing them Home: National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Straight Islander Children from their Families, HREOC, Canberra, 1997.
38.
HarawayDonna, above, ref 1, pp.131–72.
39.
BeebeBarton, ‘Law's Empire and the Final Frontier: Legalizing the Future in the Earlyorpus Juris Spatialia’, (1999) 108Yale Law Journal1737, 1771.
40.
MoylePaul, Profiting from Punishment: Private Prisons in Australia: Reform or Regression?Pluto Press, 2000; StuartRussell, ‘Private Prisons for Private Profit’, (1997) 22Alternative Law Journal7–9.
41.
HarawayDonna, above, ref 1, pp.145–6.
42.
Wilson-WildeL., above, ref 10, p.5.
43.
MeggisonW.S., Forensic Science, Certainty and Fallibility: Justice in the Age of Technology', (2001) 4Alternative Law Journal(this issue).
44.
BurbachRoger, Globalization and Postmodern Politics: From Zapatistas to High-Tech Robber Barons, Pluto Press, 2001, p.44.
45.
ThorntonMargaret, 'Neo-liberalism, Discrimination and the Politics of Ressentment, (2000) 18Law in Context8; CarneyTerry and RamiaGaby, ‘From Citizenship to Contractualism: The Transition from Unemployment Benefits to Employment Services in Australia’ (1999) 6Australian Journal of Administrative Law117.
46.
See generally BaumanZygmunt, Postmodernity and its Discontents, New York University Press, 1997.
47.
SallehAriel, Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx and the Postmodern, Zed Books, London, 1997.
48.
ShapiroMichael, 'Is Bioethics Broke? On the Idea of Ethics and Law ‘Catching Up’ with Technology? (1999) 33Indiana Law Review20, 39
49.
For a contemporary Australian perspective see PetersenAlanBarnsIanDudleyJanice and HarrisPatricia, (eds), Poststructuralism, Citizenship and Social Policy, Routledge, 1999.
50.
HeideggerMartin‘Question Concerning Technology’, in KrellDavid Farrel, (ed.), Martin Heidegger Basic Writings, Routledge, 1993. pp.311–341.
51.
HeideggerMartin, above, pp.330–3.
52.
ZimmermanMichael, Heidegger's Confrontation with Modernity: Technology, Politics and Art, Indiana University Press, 1990, p.219.