Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Office of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commissioner, Sixth Report 1998, HREOC, 1999.
2.
ChampionMark, ‘Post-Kruger: Where to Now for the Stolen Generations?’, (1998) 4(12) Indigenous Law Bulletin9–11, 10.
3.
(1992) 176 CLR 408, a case in which four members of the High Court accepted that the Director of Community Welfare owed a fiduciary relationship to the appellant arising out of his statutory office of guardian.
4.
(1998) 160 ALR 203 at 218, where the Full Federal Court said that a relationship of guardian and ward may give rise to fiduciary duties.
5.
McGuinnessP.P., ‘Editorial: Poor Fellow My “Stolen” Generation’, Quadrant, November 1999, No 361, Vol XLIIINo 11, p.2.
6.
MarshReginald, ‘“Lost”, “Stolen” or “Rescued”’, Quadrant, June 1999,No 357, Vol XLIII, No6, p.15 and HowsonPeter, ‘Rescued from a Rabbit Barrow’, p.10.
7.
Age, 2 September 2000, Extra p.1.
8.
Cf Williams v Minister, Aboriginal Land Rights Act & Anor (No 2) (1999) 25 Fam LR 86. The Australian litigation may be contrasted with the Canadian approach of suing the churches and government for abuses suffered by indigenous children in church residential schools after removal: See O'ConnorP., ‘Squaring the Circle: How Canada is Dealing with the Legacy of its Indian Residential Schools Experiment’, (2000) 6(1) Australian Journal of Human Rights188.
