MortleyR., The Faculty of Law and Management at La Trobe University, La Trobe University, Melbourne, 13 July 1999.
2.
For an insightful discussion of the changing relation of the law discipline to the humanities, see DuncansonI., ‘Broadening the Discipline of Law’ (1994) 19Melbourne University Law Review1075. See also SaratA., ‘Traditions and Trajectories in Law and Humanities Scholarship’, (1998) 10Yale J Law & the Humanities401.
3.
LyotardJ., The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press, 1984.
4.
ReadingsB., The University in Ruins, Harvard University Press, 1996.
5.
MarginsonS., Markets in Education, Allen & Unwin, 1997.
6.
BaumanZ., (1998) 12Arena Journal43, 56.
7.
ArthursW., ‘Globalization of the Mind: Canadian Elites and the Restructuring of Legal Fields’, (1997) 12Canadian Journal of Law and Society219.
8.
For example, Department of Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs, Learning for Life: Review of Higher Education Financing and Policy (West Committee Report), AGPS, Canberra, 1998.
9.
Fennell v Australian National University [1999] FCA 989; ConwayH. and ButlerJ., ‘Litigating against a University’, 148New Law Journal1438.
10.
PetersCompare M. and RobertsP., University Futures and the Politics of Reform in New Zealand, Dunmore Press, 1999, p.206.
11.
MarginsonS., ref 5, above, p.254.
12.
ReadingsW., The University in Ruins, p.13.
13.
The University of Melbourne registered Melbourne University Private Ltd, a public company limited by shares, in 1998. CorcoranS., ‘Living on the Edge: Utopia University Ltd’, (1999) 27 (2) Federal Law Review <http://law.anu.edu.au/publications/flr/Vol27no2/corcoran.htm#P-1_0>
14.
MolonyJ., ‘Australian Universities Today’ in CoadyTony, (ed.), Why Universities Matter: A Conversation about Values, Means and Directions, Allen & Unwin, 2000, p.284.
15.
GaitaRaimond, A Common Humanity: Thinking about Love and Truth and Justice, Text Publishing, 1999, p.204.
16.
AronowitzS., The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning, Beacon Press, 2000, p.165.
17.
CabalBorrero A., The University as an Institution Today, UNESCO & IDRC, Paris & Ottawa, 1993; KenwayJ. and LangmeadD., ‘Governmentality, the “Now” University and the Future of Knowledge Work’, (1998) 41Australian Universities Review28.
18.
MarginsonS., ‘Nation-building Universities in a Global Environment: The Choices before us’, Public Lecture Series — The Role of Universities in Australia in 2010, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 10 September 1998 <http://www.unisa.edu.au/newsinfo/lecture/Marginson_lecture.htm>
19.
DuncanG., ‘Notes from a Departed Dean’ in JamesPaul (ed.) Burning Down the House: The Bonfire of the Universities, Association for the Public University with Arena Publications, North Carlton, 2000. Cf BessantR., ‘“A Climate of Fear”: Universities Yesterday and Today’, unpublished paper, Melbourne.
20.
Ian Duncanson argues that the discourses of conservatism similarly produce an oppressive masculinist character to the nation state itself. See DuncansonI., ‘Mr Hobbes Goes to Australia: Law, Politics and Difference’, (2000) International Journal for the Semiotics of Law (forthcoming).
21.
JonesK., Compassionate Authority: Democracy and the Representation of Women, Routledge, 1993, p.121.
22.
The idea that legal education is the cheapest of all disciplines to offer appears to be resisted only in the United States. See TwiningW., ‘Rethinking Law Schools’ (1996) 21Law and Social Inquiry1007, 1015.
23.
For accounts of the emergence of the liberal law school, see for example ParkerC. and GoldsmithA.‘“Failed Sociologists” in the Market Place: Law Schools in Australia’, (1998) 25Journal of Law and Society33.
24.
ThorntonM., ‘Technocentrism in the Law School: Why the Gender and Colour of Law Remain the Same’, (1998) 36Osgoode Hall Law School369.
25.
ResnikJ., ‘On the Margin: Humanities and Law’, (1998) 10Yale J Law & the Humanities415.
ThorntonM., ‘Portia Lost in the Groves of Academe Wondering What to do About Legal Education’, Inaugural Lecture, La Trobe University Press, 1991, p.2.
30.
Cf LancasterJ., The Modernisation of Legal Education: A Critique of the Martin, Bowen and Pearce Reports, Centre for Legal Education, Sydney, 1993, p.71et passim.
31.
Council of Legal Education Victoria, Report of Academic Course Appraisal Committee on Legal Knowledge required for Admission to Practise, Council of Legal Education, Victoria, Melbourne, 1990, p 12.
32.
The Australian Uniform Admission Rules specify Criminal Law and Procedure, Torts, Contracts, Property (Real and Personal), Equity (including Trusts), Federal and State Constitutional Law, Civil Procedure, Evidence, Company Law and Professional Conduct.
33.
TwiningW., ‘Rethinking Law Schools’, (1996) 21Law and Social Inquiry1007, 1012.
KelseyJ., ‘Privatizing the Universities’, (1998) 25Journal of Law and Society51, 68.
38.
Association of University Staff of New Zealand v University of Waikato, High Court, Hamilton, File No CP 12–99, 31 March 1999, unreported.
39.
Backhouse, Connie‘The Changing Landscape of Canadian Legal Education’, Paper presented at ‘Excellence, Competition and Hierarchy’, Workshop on the Future of Canadian Legal Education, Legal Research Institute, University of Manitoba, 3–4 May 1999 <http://www.umanitoba.ca/Law/LRI/Legal_education/>
40.
KenwayJ. and LangmeadD., ref 17, above, p.29.
41.
Supreme Court of Victoria, No 2197 of 1996, 31 October 1996, unreported. The plaintiff was unsuccessful.
42.
PetersCompare and Roberts, University Futures, p.102.
43.
KelseyJ., ref 36, above, p.67.
44.
MillerHillis J., ‘The University of Dissensus’, (1995) 17Oxford Literary Review121.
45.
Described in graphic detail by PetersM. and RobertsP., ref 10, above, University Futures, pp.187–207.
