Dealing with Democracy

Habermas J. , ‘Further Reflections on the Public Sphere’, in Calhoun C. (ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA, 1992, p. 452; Cohen J. , ‘Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy’ in Benhabib S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton University Press, 1996, p.95.

Habermas J. , ‘Three Normative Models of Democracy’ in Benhabib S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton University Press, 1996, pp.21–31.

Habermas J. , above, ref 2, p. 21.

Habermas J. , ref 2, p.22.

Habermas J. , Theory of Communicative Action, Beacon Press, Boston, 1987.

Habermas J. , above, ref 2, p.25.

Cohen J. , ‘Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy’ in Hamlin A. and Pettit P. (eds), The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, Basil Blackwell, UK, 1989, p.29.

Chambers S. , ‘Discourse and Democratic Practices’ in White S. (ed), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge University Press, NY, 1995, p.239.

Manin B. , ‘On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation’, (1987) 15(3) Political Theory 338 at 352.

Chambers , above, ref 8, p.241.

Chambers , above, ref 8, p.241. See also Cohen, above, ref 7, p.28.

Manin , above, ref 9, p.356.

Habermas , above, ref 1, p.452.

Cohen , above, ref 7, p.31.

Cohen J. and Sabel C. , ‘Directly Deliberative Polyarchy’, <http://www.columbia.edu/∼cfs11/DDP.html> p.18.

Habermas , above, ref 1, p.452.

For a comprehensive outline of the proposed teledemocracy model see: London S. , ‘Teledemocracy vs Deliberative Democracy: A Comparative Look at Two Models of Public Talk’, (1995) 3(2) Journal of Interpersonal Computing and Technology 33.

Parry G. and Moran M. , Democracy and Democratisation, Routledge, London, 1994, p.1.