AronssonI.-L.HassnainH. (2021). Evaluation and ethics in contexts of fragility, conflict and volence. In Van den BergR. D.HawkinsP.StameN. (Eds.), Ethics for evaluation: Beyond “doing no harm” to “tackling bad” and “doing good. Routledge.
GroenewaldC. (2023). Reasoning in criminal intelligence analysis through an argumentation theory-based framework[Doctoral thesis, Middlesex University]. https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8q473
5.
GuentherJ.OliverR.OberR.HolmesC. (2024). Remote school retention in Australia: Why do First Nations students disengage and drop out?Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 34(3), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.47381/aijre.v34i3.743
6.
HutchinsonK. (Ed.), (2019). Evaluation failures: 22 tales of mistakes made and lessons learned. Sage Publications.
7.
MayerH.WallnerM. (2024). Nursing effectiveness reconsidered: Some fundamental reflections on the nature of nursing. Nursing Philosophy, 25(4), Article e12505. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12505
8.
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council Universities Australia. (2023). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. National Health and Medical Research Council. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/file/19531/download?token=rpY3-bU5
9.
SmythB. M.MartinM. A.DowningM. (2024). The Routledge handbook of human research ethics and integrity in Australia. Taylor & Francis.
10.
SödermanE. (2022). Creating knowledge through community theatre: No border musical and the making of representations. In The Critical Methodologies Collective (Ed.), The politics and ethics of representation in qualitative research (pp. 43–59). Routledge.
11.
Van den BergR. D.HawkinsP.StameN. (2021). Ethics for evaluation: Beyond “doing no harm” to “tackling bad” and “doing good. Routledge.