Evaluation practice takes place in a particularly awkward and challenging social context due to the fear, resistance and anxiety that is often associated with evaluation. Navigating this social context is taxing for evaluators and has the potential to negatively impact their well-being. This article begins with an exploration of the positioning of qualitative and relational approaches within the evaluation field over time, showing that they have been increasingly acknowledged and now widely accepted as crucial to the practice of evaluation. More recent literature is then used to identify six social competencies that are essential to on-the-ground evaluation practice. These competencies are in allaying fear and anxiety, establishing rapport, building and maintaining professional credibility, recognising tacit social dynamics, preventing and managing coercion attempts, and preventing and managing hostility. The article then explores the implications of working in this social context for evaluator well-being. Difficulties around self-assessing competency levels, contending with a poor reputation, emotional labour and self-care, and limited research specific to these matters are discussed. This article posits that practising evaluators should routinely reflect and take active steps to not only improve their social competence but also maintain their own well-being.
BecharS.Mero-JaffeI. (2014). Who is afraid of evaluation? Ethics in evaluation research as a way to cope with excessive evaluation anxiety: Insights from a case study. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(3), 364–376.
7.
BeckerK. L.RengerR.McPhersonM. (2015). Indicators of buy-in to gauge evaluation success. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 15(2), 12–21.
CaracelliV. J. (2000). Evaluation use at the threshold of the twenty-first century. New Directions for Evaluation, 88, 99–111.
10.
ChelimskyE. (1997). The political environment of evaluation and what it means for the development of the field. In ChelimskyE.ShadishW. R. (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 53–68). SAGE.
11.
ChelimskyE. (1998). The role of experience in formulating theories of evaluation practice. The American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 35–55.
12.
ChelimskyE. (2012). Balancing evaluation theory and practice in the real world. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(1), 91–98.
13.
ChouinardJ. A. (2015). Introduction: Decolonizing international development evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(3).
14.
ChouinardJ. A.CousinsJ. B. (2021). Developing an ethical rationale for collaborative approaches to evaluation. Evaluation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389020978501
15.
CousinsJ. B. (Ed.). (2019). Collaborative approaches to evaluation: Principles in use (Vol. 3). SAGE.
16.
CranoW. D.BrewerM. B.LacA. (2014). Principles and methods of social research (3rd ed.). Routledge.
17.
DaviesR.MacKayK. (2014). Evaluator training: Content and topic valuation in university evaluation courses. American Journal of Evaluation, 35, 739–756.
18.
Dickson-SwiftV.JamesE. L.KippenS.LiamputtongP. (2007). Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research, 7(3), 327–353.
19.
DonaldsonS. I. (2001). Overcoming our negative reputation: Evaluation becomes known as a helping profession. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 355–361.
20.
DonaldsonS. I.GoolerL. E.ScrivenM. (2002). Strategies for managing evaluation anxiety: Toward a psychology of program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(3), 261–273.
21.
DouglasH. (2014). Values in social science. In CartwrightN.MontuschiE. (Eds.), Philosophy of social science: A new introduction (pp. 162–182). Oxford University Press.
22.
GarciaG. L.StevahnL. (2020). Situational awareness and interpersonal competence as evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(1), 107–124.
23.
GhereG.KingJ.StevahnL.MinnemaJ. (2006). A professional development unit for reflecting on program evaluator competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1), 108–123.
24.
GoodyearL. (2005). Rapport. In MathisonS., (Ed.), Encyclopedia of evaluation (p. 358). SAGE.
25.
GoodyearL.BarelaE.JewissJ.UsingerJ. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative inquiry in evaluation: From theory to practice (Vol. 29). John Wiley & Sons.
26.
GreeneJ. C. (2001). Evaluation extrapolations. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 397–402.
27.
GrobG. F. (2014). How to become an effective advocate without selling your soul. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(3), 391–397.
28.
GrobG. F. (2018). Evaluation practice: Proof, truth, client relationships, and professional growth. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(1), 123–132.
29.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. Jossey-Bass.
30.
HouseE. R. (1995). Principled evaluation: A critique of the AEA guiding principles. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 66, 27–34.
31.
JohnsonB.ClarkeJ. (2003). Collecting sensitive data: The impact on researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 421–434.
32.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.StevahnL. (2011). Social interdependence and program evaluation. In MarkM. M.DonaldsonS. I.CampbellB. (Eds.), Social psychology and evaluation (pp. 288–317). Guilford Press.
33.
KingJ.StevahnL. (2013). Interactive evaluation practice: Mastering the interpersonal dynamics of program evaluation. SAGE.
34.
KirkhartK. E. (1995). 1994 conference theme: Evaluation and social justice seeking multicultural validity: A postcard from the road. Evaluation Practice, 16(1), 1–12.
35.
Le DantecC. A.FoxS. (2015, March14–18). Strangers at the gate: Gaining access, building rapport, and co-constructing community-based research [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
36.
Lee-TreweekG.LinkogleS. (Eds.). (2000). Danger in the field. Psychology Press.
37.
LevitonL. C. (2001). Presidential address: Building evaluation’s collective capacity. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(1), 1–12.
38.
LevitonL. C. (2014). Generative insights from the Eleanor Chelimsky forum on evaluation theory and practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 35(2), 244–249.
39.
MarkM. M. (2002). Toward better understanding of alternative evaluator roles. In RyanK. E.SchwandtT. A. (Eds.), Exploring evaluator role and identity (pp. 17–36). Information Age Publishing.
40.
McDonaldK. E.MyrickS. E. (2008). Principles, promises, and a personal plea: What is an evaluator to do?American Journal of Evaluation, 29(3), 343–351.
41.
McKeggK. (2003). From margins to mainstream: The importance of people and context in evaluation utilisation. In LuntN.DavidsonC.MckeggK. (Eds.), Evaluating policy and practice: A New Zealand reader (pp. 214–234). Pearson.
42.
MertensD. M. (2001). Inclusivity and transformation: Evaluation in 2010. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3), 367–374.
43.
MorabitoS. M. (2002). Evaluator roles and strategies for expanding evaluation process influence. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(3), 321–330.
44.
MorrisM. (2003). Ethical considerations in evaluation. In KellaghanT.StufflebeamD. L. (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 303–327). Springer.
45.
MorrisM. (2008). Evaluation ethics for best practice. The Guilford Press.
46.
MorrisM. (2011). The good, the bad, and the evaluator: 25 Years of AJE ethics. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(1), 134–151.
47.
NjovuJ. T. (2020). COVID-19 and indigenous evaluation in Zambia: My responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Evaluation Matters—He Take Tō Te Aromatawai, 93–103.
PattonM. Q. (2012). Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. SAGE.
51.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Evaluation in the field: The need for site visit standards. American Journal of Evaluation, 36(4), 444–460.
52.
PerrinB. (2019). How to manage pressure to change reports: Should evaluators be above criticism?American Journal of Evaluation, 40(3), 354–375.
53.
PodemsD. R. (2018). Being an evaluator: Your practical guide to evaluation. Guildford Press.
54.
Rodríguez-CamposL.Rincones-GómezR. (2012). Collaborative evaluations: Step-by-step (2nd ed.). Stanford Business Books.
55.
RyanK. E.SchwandtT. A. (Eds.). (2002). Exploring evaluator role identity. Information Age Publishing.
56.
SarantakosS. (2013). Social research (4th ed.). Macmillan.
57.
SchwandtT. A. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Sage.
58.
ScrivenM. (1996). Types of evaluation and types of evaluator. Evaluation Practice, 17(2), 151–161.
59.
ScrivenM. (1997). Truth and objectivity in evaluation. In ChelimskyE.ShadishW. R. (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 477–500). SAGE.
60.
SkolitsG. J.MorrowJ. A.BurrE. M. (2009). Reconceptualizing evaluator roles. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 275–295.
61.
StakeR. E. (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Merrill.
62.
StakeR. E. (1991). Retrospective on ‘the countenance of educational evaluation’. Teachers College Record, 92(6), 65–88.
63.
StammB. (1999). Secondary traumatic stress: Self-care issues for clinicians, researchers, and educators (2nd ed.). The Sidran Press.
64.
StevahnL.KingJ. A. (2014). What does it take to be an effective qualitative evaluator? Essential competencies. In GoodyearL.BarelaE.JewissJ.UsingerJ. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in evaluation: From theory to practice (pp. 141–166). John Wiley & Sons.
65.
StevahnL.KingJ. A.GhereG.MinnemaJ. (2005). Establishing essential competencies for program evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 43–59.
66.
TautS. M.AlkinM. C. (2003). Program staff perceptions of barriers to evaluation implementation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(2), 213–226.
TorresR. T.PreskillH. S.PiontekM. E. (2005). Evaluation strategies for communicating and reporting: Enhancing learning in organizations (2nd ed.). SAGE.
69.
WarnerL. H. (2020). Developing interpersonal skills of evaluators: A service-learning approach. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(3), 432–451.
