This article introduces the notion of ‘Evaluation that Empowers’ (EtE) as a model for generating ‘evaluation-mindedness’, which means to convey a deep and sustainable shift in organisational practice. The author developed the EtE Model through a literature review and a case study that involved examining evaluation practice in action. This article presents the initial findings from this research. What emerges is a framework for guiding evaluation practices that are participatory, empowering, sustainable and embedded.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArvidsonM.2009, Impact and evaluation in the UK third sector: reviewing literature and exploring ideas, Working Paper 27, Third Sector Research Centre, Birmingham, UK.
2.
CousinsJ.B., & WhitmoreE.1998, ‘Framing participatory evaluation’, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 80, pp. 5–23.
3.
EllisJ., & GregoryT.2008, Accountability and learning—developing monitoring and evaluation in the third sector: research report, Charities Evaluation Services, London.
4.
FreireP.1982, ‘Creating alternative research methods: learning to do it by doing it’, in HallB, GilletteA, & TandonR (eds), Creating knowledge: a monopoly—participatory research in development, Society for Participatory Research in Asia, New Delhi.
5.
GreenawayL.2011, ‘Evaluation that Empowers: a review of evaluation approaches that empower the voices of individuals, organisations and communities’, research assignment, University of Dundee, Scotland.
HeronJ., & ReasonP.1997, ‘A participatory inquiry paradigm’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 274–294.
8.
HooleE., & PattersonT.E.2008, ‘Evaluation as part of a learning culture’, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 119, pp. 93–113.
9.
NevoD.1993, ‘The evaluation-minded school: an application of perceptions from program evaluation’, Evaluation Practice, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 39–47.
10.
O'SullivanR.G., & O'SullivanJ.M.1998, ‘Evaluation voices: promoting evaluation from within programmes through collaboration’, Evaluation and Programme Planning, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 21–29.
11.
PattonM.Q.1997, Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text, 3rd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
12.
ReasonP.1994, ‘Three approaches to participatory inquiry’, in DenzinN.K., & LincolnY.S. (eds), Handbook of qualitative research, Sage, London.
13.
TorresR.T., & PreskillH.2001, ‘Evaluation and organisational learning: past, present and future’, American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 387–395.
14.
VolkovB.B.2011, ‘Beyond being an evaluator: the multiplicity of roles of the internal evaluator’, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 132, pp. 25–42.
15.
WadsworthY.2001, ‘Becoming responsive—and some consequences for evaluation as dialogue across distance’, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 92, pp. 45–58.
