BakerEL & O'NeilHF2006, ‘Evaluating web-based learning environments’, in O'NeilHF & PerezRS (eds), Web-based learning: theory, research and practice, Erlbaum, Mahwah, New Jersey.
2.
BatesAW1995, Technology, open learning and distance education, Routledge, London.
3.
BelangerF & JordanDH2000, Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: technologies, tools and techniques, Idea Group, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
4.
BundersonCV2003, ‘Four frameworks for viewing blended learning cases: comments and critiques’, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 279-288.
5.
ClarkRE1994, ‘Assessment of distance learning technology’, in BakerEL & O'NeilHF, Jr (eds), Technology assessment in education and training, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
6.
CollisBA1993, ‘Evaluating instructional applications of telecommunications in distance education’, Educational and Training Technology International, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 266-274.
7.
GoolerD1979, ‘Evaluating distance education programs’, Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 43-55.
8.
HughesJ & AttwellG2002, ‘A framework for the evaluation of e-learning’, paper presented to a seminar series on: Exploring models and partnerships for e-learning in SMEs, held in Stirling, Scotland and Brussels, Belgium, in November 2002 and February 2003.
9.
KirkpatrickDL & KirkpatrickJD2006, Evaluating training programs: the four levels, 3rd edn, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
10.
LamP & McNaughtC2005, ‘Building an evaluation culture and evidence base for e-learning in three Hong Kong universities’, British journal of Educational Technology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 599-614.
11.
LorenzoG & MooreJC2002, Report to the nation: five pillars of quality online education, The Sloan Consortium, Needham, Massachusetts.
12.
MabryL2001, ‘Responsive evaluation is to personalized assessment …’, New Directions for Evaluation, no. 92, pp. 89-102.
13.
MannCC1998, ‘Quality assurance in distance education: the Surrey MA (TESOL) experience’, Distance Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7-22.
14.
MessickS1989, ‘Validity’, in LinnRL (ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd edn, Macmillan, New York.
15.
MessickS1998, ‘Test validity: a matter of consequence’, Social Indicators Research, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 35-44.
16.
RuheV2002, ‘Issues in the validation of assessment in technology-based distance and distributed learning: what can we learn from Messick's framework?’, International Journal of Testing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 143-159.
17.
RumbleG1981, ‘Evaluating autonomous multimedia distance education systems: a practical approach’, Distance Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71-76.
18.
ScanlonE, JonesA, BarnardJ, ThompsonJ & CalderJ2000, ‘Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning’, Educational Technology and Society, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1-10, viewed 14 February 2004, <ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_4_2000/scanloon.html>.
19.
StufflebeamDL & ShinkfieldAJ2007, Evaluation theory, models, and applications, Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer, San Francisco.
20.
Van SlykeC, KittnerM & BelangerF1998, ‘Distance education: a telecommuting perspective’, in Proceedings of the fourth Americas conference on information systems, Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 666-668.
21.
ZahariasP2005, ‘E-learning design quality: a holistic conceptual framework’, in HowardC, BoettcherJ, JusticeL, RogersP & BergGA (eds), Encyclopedia of distance learning, Idea Group, New York.