Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Peer-based programs are increasingly used by community organisations to support vulnerable youth who are at risk of developing mental health problems. Such programs are as diverse as the populations they support and include: drop-in services; peer education; as well as camps and online discussion forums for hard-to-reach populations that may not access more conventional forms of support, owing to issues of stigma or accessibility (for example, same-sex-attracted youth and teenage parents). There has been limited evaluation of peer-based community programs. Therefore, the lack of evidence of program effectiveness makes it difficult for service providers to secure continuous funding and threatens program sustainability. This article reports on a study designed to investigate barriers and enablers associated with evaluating peer-based youth programs. The resulting implications for policy, practice and research are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

, Lobo

, Maycock

, & Burns

2007, ‘A framework for defining the role of peer-based approaches in mental health promotion’, International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, vol, 9, no. 3, pp. 27–34.

Catalano

R.F.

, Berglund

M.L.

, Ryan

J.A.M.

, Lonczak

G.S.

, & Hawkins

J.D.

2004, ‘Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 591, no. 1, pp. 98–124.

Chaskin

R.J.

2009, ‘Toward a theory of change in community-based practice with youth: a case-study exploration, Children and Youth Services Review, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1127–1134.

Crosby

R.A.

, Salazar

, Diclemente

R.J.

, & Lang

D.L.

2005, ‘Balancing rigor against the inherent limitations of investigating hard-to-reach populations’, Health Education Research, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–5.

Dukakis

, London

R.A.

, McLaughlin

, & Williamson

2009, Positive youth development: individual, setting and system level indicators, Issue Brief, John W Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities, Stanford, California.

Maycock

, & Howat

2007, ‘Social capital: implications from an investigation of illegal anabolic steroid networks’, Health Education Research, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 854–863.

McDonald

2004, Alcohol and other drug peer education in schools: a review for the ACT Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Strategy Implementation and Evaluation Group, Social Research and Evaluation, Canberra.

Miles

, & Huberman

1994, Qualitative data analysis, 2nd edn, Sage, London.

Olsson

, Boyce

, Toumbourou

, & Sawyer

2005, ‘The role of peer support in facilitating psychosocial adjustment to chronic illness in adolescence’, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 78–87.

10.

Parkin

, & McKeganey

2000, ‘The rise and rise of peer education approaches’, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 293–310.

11.

Sachmann

2007, Peer group support weekends: evaluation report (14-18 year olds), University of Western Australia, Perth.

12.

Shiner

1999, ‘Defining peer education’, Journal of Adolescence, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 555–566.

13.

Stanton-Salazar

, & Spina

2005, ‘Adolescent peer networks as a context for social and emotional support’, Youth and Society, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 379–417.

14.

Surko

, Pasti

L.W.

, Whitlock

, & Benson

D.A.

2006, ‘Selecting statewide youth development outcome indicators’, Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Supplement, S72–S78.

15.

Truman

, Rankin

, Backed-Milburn

, & Plad

2007, ‘Drop-in services: findings from an evaluation of the Healthy Living Centres programme in Scotland’, Health Education Journal, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 22–31.

16.

Turner

1999, ‘Peer support and young people's health’, Journal of Adolescence, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 567–572.

17.

Turner

, & Shepherd

1999, ‘A method in search of a theory: peer education and health promotion’, Health Education Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 235–247.

Evaluating Peer-based Youth Programs: Barriers and Enablers

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References